UFC on Fox 30: Eddie Alvarez vs. Dustin Poirier 2 Preview of the forefoot – a full breakdown



[ad_1]

Eddie Alvarez vs. Dustin Poirier 2 UFC titles on Fox 30 this July 28, 2018 at Scotiabank Saddledome in Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Summary of a sentence

Phil : Violence Part 2 : The Re -Violence

David : Crimson Tide 2: Starring Mental Washington, and Gene Hacked-Man

Stats

Record : Eddie Alvarez 29-5-1 NC | Dustin Poirier 23-5-1 NC

Chances : Eddie Alvarez +150 | Dustin Poirier -160

History / Introduction to the Two Fighters

David : Alvarez entered the world of MMA as part of the "new race". Like Blade's version, he possessed all his singular strengths, and none of their weaknesses. His first run in DREAM was the stuff of … dreams – except for Bas's comment; Blasphemy or not, I've always found his comment full of platitudes to be "legendary". Whatever the case may be, big wars with Kawajiri, Dida and Hansen have revealed a rising star until he meets a psychopath. Since then, he has been a staple no matter where he's beaten. Now American Knuckle Star is turning to the UFC officials, who ruined everything in their first fight.

Phil : Eddie Alvarez had a difficult career where he fought a wide selection of killers in Japan. He had a tough career where he fought a wide selection of killers in Bellator. The UFC has not resisted this trend. Cerrone, Melendez, Pettis, GDR, McGregor, Pear, Gaethje, and now Pearwood again. This is not the kind of schedule that most people face in their 15th year in the sport. Or, you know, sometimes that's the case, but it's usually depressing ram's blows. Instead, The Underground King always seems to be close to its climax. The battles of Melendez and Pettis were tactically disappointing, but just about everything was a glorious, winning or lost violence. Even then, he has given us so much entertainment over the years that he has earned the right to ask and fight his way through every fight he's got now. Most people do not give us a candidate for the fight of the year during their career, Alvarez gave us a minimum of three (Gaethje, Chandler II, Kawajiri).

David : Some fighters spend so much time in the UFC, you naturally underestimate them. We've seen them lose, so it's easy to focus on their flaws. Poirier has been a mainstay of the UFC for all the right reasons. It's a junkie of action, but not an idiot, so it's always a pleasure to have it fight on a map. That said, it sounds like a big fight to pbad the time rather than a big fight to clarify the division. Both men beat Justin Gaethje, so it's just the natural place to take on the show of the next violence.

Phil : Dustin Poirier is someone else who has almost never given us a boring fight. He was a hope of returning in the early booming years of the 80-100 UFC boom, at a time when the novelty of MMA was yet to disappear and was beginning to sniff the mainstream acceptance. While his colleague Erik Koch had written a book about him, Poirier was the subject of a documentary entitled (I believe) Fightland. Hard to imagine what kind of thing is happening nowadays about a slight regional Louisiana. It's not a Smashing Machine, but it's definitely worth it. It was also a time before people realized how many talented fighters would be filtering into the lighter weight divisions. His contemporaries like Koch have failed, and Poirier himself has been defeated several times. He burst into tears in his mother 's arms after losing to the Korean Zombie, and was embarrbaded by McGregor, but in one way or another he stayed the course and went on. is quietly improved. Now he is on the verge of title conflict, while becoming the kind of person who is auctioning his fighting gear for charity. It's hard not to look back at his climb and not be a little moved.

What is at stake?

David : Many things. It just depends on how it goes. If they fight with only their torsos left standing – a dramatic scenario, but totally possible – they will certainly be in line. If it's just a good fight, and nothing more, they'll need a queue to wait for what the law and McGregor are doing.

Phil : Alvarez says that he will only accept a shot on Nurmagomedov with a win, which is … hmm. I do not think that happens. I think Nurmagomedov will probably fight against someone else, who has recently been released for his Dolly – related offenses with a wrist slap. The winner probably fights against Tony Ferguson, while the loser fights Kevin Lee.

Where do they want it?

David : I have the impression that Alvarez 's fight was a direct result of his typing skills. He somehow popularized the wrestler learning to fight not to seek submissions but to position himself for punches to Cain Velasquez. As such, his strike has become a fluid monster. It soaks, weaves, gradations, feints, stuttering, not, pivots, and it all looks like the most advanced punch in MMA (well, basic boxing if we're honest) until Alvarez inevitably reaches that point where he is hurt, or eager to make the pain – giving his opponent additional opportunities – and all hell breaks loose. At its best, Alvarez can lure punches out of his opponent, weaving his punches through the traffic like a Ducati. This allows him to embark with more entries, either by punches or by takedowns. His problem is that it's not really a double threat. He is a very good grappler, and a strong technical wrestler, but he does not explode with his disbademblies, or fill those gaps of entry. In addition, he tends to be hit with the first punch in a lot sequence. His defense is good despite his reputation, but his stature / posture makes him vulnerable more often than most fighters. I think part of the problem is that he is a counter-fighter in the body of a brawler. He has the skills for that, but not the patience.

Phil : Alvarez is an anti-fighter. A smart fighter, he came in fighting a bizarre selection of clearly defined threats in the Japanese scene, from Joachim Hansen's kickboxing, to Shinya Aoki's grip. Kawajiri's power, and … whatever Kikuno does. What Alvarez built in response was a wide and deep game that nonetheless had a number of caveats: it only worked effectively in a certain range, and it only had one number limited turns to close once the opponent decided to stay on the outside. Once in range, he is an effective wrestler, a shooter and a defensive wrestler, with a predilection for hand-to-hand punches. He is an excellent combined boxer, one of the best body hitters in the sport, and he is one of the few fighters who is able to escape the pressure once trapped on the cage – he pretends, he changes direction, and he hits moves. Like Frankie Edgar, his training partner, his senseless hardness and his calm under fire have allowed him to be an intelligent and adaptive fighter. Even in difficult confrontations like Melendez and Pettis, he found ways to deceive the victories.

David : I do not know if I repeat myself, but where Alvarez is a counter-striker in the body of a brawler, Poirier is a brawler in the body of a counterattacker . Poirier advances with violent precision that he has trouble withholding. He is like a hateful version of José Aldo. Where Aldo is content to play with defined proximity, Poirier will simply search and destroy with just enough knowledge to avoid Gaethje's thunder. That's how Poirier caught Alvarez the first time; he recoiled and was recovering with a rapid precision to push a brutal left right. When he has control, Poirier's attack launches a wide net of bullets; and it's better when he's in close combat. He has the same problem that Alvarez has though; The instinct of this brawler means that he has blind spots when it comes to defending the entries.

Phil : Dustin Poirier was the kind of fighter that Eddie Alvarez devours. Throughout his featherweight career, and most of his light run, he has been a pressure fighter who has come behind a left-hand gun and a vicious fight and fight game, which looks great in Alvarez, but with a little more on the snap-down and starter arce. The love for punches at a necklace is shared by both men. However, the historical problems of Poirier were that the second he was denied his pressure towards the front, things started to go wrong. He had thrown a double guard before settling behind him, in the style of Joe Lauzon, until the opponent gave up on him. Sometimes they would not do it. He could be seen putting himself in the head as he shot and then took a deep, worried breath. The most impressive thing about Poirier, is that he seems to have made a good cure for this major psychological loophole. You can still see him worrying a bit in his fights … but you can also see him calm down.

More than that, he has become a much more developed technical fighter, who has at least two gears in which he can fight. He's no longer just a fighter, but someone who can box at a distance: he mixes in lighter strokes of his power, is much harder to hit than in the past, and can use that guard of Forearms to block, and then come back with a counter rather than a panicked shell.

Overview of Past Fights

David : It's hard to ignore the first fight. The two fighters were wounded, but Alvarez was wounded during the storm. Poirier is the one who created it. That's the difference for me. I do not see Alvarez close the distance and score big with his own punch entries because he's never been that type of fighter. He has tools to score in the middle of the range (his kicks are good, especially when he goes upstairs), but that 's not how he initiates. Watch any good fight from Alvarez: the chaos began when Alvares was dropped by a left hook of Kawajiri; chaos began against Dida when Dida stuck him with a pronated right; against Dustin, right to left; against Hansen, he started with all punches . And so on. I can not trust Alvarez to succeed on this kind of basis "as long as it's a fight, I have a shot".

Phil : The main thing about their first fight for me is that Poirier was winning really, really easily, and that Alvarez was inches away from the exit. I think that the return of Alvarez may have been a bit exaggerated, because at no time did he hurt Poirier so much. Gaethje's fight was also encouraging from Poirier's point of view: he got in trouble, against someone who got the better of the fights, but he stayed calm and continued to break the fight.

Alvarez is an excellent game planner, but it seems that the new style of Poirier is exceptionally difficult for him. Essentially, all that Poirier has to do is improve his performance a bit and he drops Alvarez. It looks like Alvarez has to come out with something much more dramatic, and I'm not even sure what that might be. How does he get closer to distance with his right hand (rather risky)? This is not really a question we have already seen him answer.

X-Factors

David : Nothing important except the thousands of punches that each man took in his long career.

Phil : Just if Alvarez's career will finally start catching him. He has done well against Gaethje, one of the best performances of his career, but once again we are talking about a man who began his career in the Year of Our Lord 2003

Prognostication

David : Alvarez needs more than a gameplan. He needs the instinct to understand an urgent / savvy midrange attack that does not let itself be so vulnerable to quick punch inputs. It's really simple for me. Like any good battle plan, know your outings. Pear tree has more ways to get in, and more ways to go out. Alvarez is smoked. Or become smoked meat as this human html code could say. Dustin Poirier by KO, turn 1 .

Phil : This is a very difficult puzzle to solve for Alvarez. Body shots? Takedowns? Trying to attract pear tree in the counters? All this seems difficult in the face of the problem that has plagued Alvarez since Kikuno: how to get closer to a long and dangerous attacker who does not necessarily want to be closed. I'm worried that this time, Poirier is doing a big blow, and that the time that has elapsed has pbaded, the little ribbon that prevented Alvarez from coming out of the void is no longer there . Dustin Poirier by TKO, 1st round.

[ad_2]
Source link