Vaccines, no vax loses tax incentives in Australia



[ad_1]

Precisely in these AIFA, the Italian Drug Agency, disclosed data from the Vaccini 2017 report, post-marketing surveillance in Italy

The purpose of the publication is to justify all suspected adverse reactions in 2017 and previous years included in the national pharmacovigilance system. Reports of adverse events increased, but 80% were considered not serious

"Immunization reports (6,696) account for 16% of the total number of drug and vaccine reports inserted in 2017 and come mainly from health staff, not medical (57%). Follow-up reports from doctors (21.4%) and citizens / patients (13.2%) "they say from AIFA

Adverse effects the most frequently described are: fever, local reactions, generalized skin reactions and hyperpyrexia. Other more important ones such as agitation / irritability, allergic conditions, vomiting, pain, crying and headaches, are less common and yet already known because reported in the product leaflet

. compulsory vaccinations, from 4 to 10 for children up to 16 years, were necessary because coverage had fallen below 95%, the minimum threshold recommended by the World Health Organization.

The last few years have repeatedly explained that in order to protect the entire population from the epidemics of various viruses, the percentage of people immunized must be between 93 and 95%.

This is what is called "collective immunity": almost the entire population is vaccinated, even those who can not be vaccinated (for example because of special medical conditions) 39) prevent) benefit from protection against malat

Despite all the law has reached its goal and, as we have just seen, the vaccines are absolutely safe, the new government seems headed towards the withdrawal of the law.

Yet while Italy is thinking concretely to take a step back, other countries, even without introducing any obligation, are moving in the direction of maximum immunization coverage.

A striking example comes from Australia where, starting in the new fiscal year, parents refuse to be vaccinated. their children will receive a reduction in the tax benefits provided by the family tax system.

The initiative is naturally intended to encourage vaccinations and increase immunization coverage, for the protection of the health of all Australians. [19659002] The initiative called " No trouble, no salary ", which means "No vaccination, no salary", and affects Part A of the benefit Federal Tax Measures for Families and Relief for People with Dependent Children

More specifically, for every unvaccinated child, a reduction of $ 28 is calculated every two weeks on the expected relief.

According to Dan Tehan, Australia 's Minister of Social Services, the lowest cash outlays every two weeks will be an effective "constant reminder" for those who are against vaccines. "Immunization," he said, "is the surest way to protect children from vaccine-preventable diseases." Parents who do not immunize their children not only put their children at risk. children, but also those of other people. "

We also recall that the prohibition of access to school for those who are not vaccinated is quite common in the world: , for example in the United States, Canada and Japan

Germany, which has never had an obligation to vaccinate, after 410 cases of measles since the beginning of the year decided to impose a fine on parents who bring to the nest with 2500 euros Non-immunized children

In total, in the European Union, 13 out of 28 countries have vaccination obligations, even if they are often nominal, without penalty, and are almost always limited to one or more "historic" vaccines, against lio, diphtheria, pertussis and tetanus

Italy added measles, rubella, mumps, chicken pox, meningococcus C and B, Haemophilus influenzae B, hepatitis B.

[ad_2]
Source link