Joe Biden’s Texas loss shows how conservative justice can thwart his agenda



[ad_1]

The Texas-based judge’s short-term order could also force a confrontation all the way to the United States Supreme Court, where Biden’s legal team is already facing tough choices about how to lobby for news. legal positions before the nine judges – six of whom are Conservatives, including three appointed by former President Donald Trump.

U.S. District Judge Drew Tipton, also appointed by Trump, on Tuesday sided with Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, a Trump loyalist who challenged Biden’s temporary stay of deportations.

The national reach of Tipton’s order further intensifies debate over the large-scale actions against the executive power imposed by a single judge, which were the bane of the Trump administration.

“These nationwide injunctions thwarted presidential politics for much of the president’s tenure with no clear end in sight,” then Attorney General William Barr said in a 2019 speech.

Lawyers for Trump’s Justice Department have consistently been successful in convincing the Supreme Court to lift these injunctions, although this sometimes takes months. The Conservative Supreme Court majority may not be as sympathetic to Biden’s businesses as they are to Trump’s.

A four-year timeline of Donald Trump and the Supreme Court
All in all, Tuesday’s lawsuit against an administration barely a week old reveals how difficult it could be to push forward a new immigration agenda or any domestic policy if it were hit with lawsuits in front of it. judges who have become increasingly right-wing during Trump’s tenure.

As Biden promotes new agendas and encounters legal objections, there is no denying that they will be resolved by lifelong judges, 30% of whom were appointed by Trump.

Challenge on the suspension of evictions

The break on deportations, announced immediately after Biden’s inauguration, reflects a desire to dismantle Trump’s anti-immigrant practices. Biden also halted construction of the southern border wall.

Department of Homeland Security officials said the 100-day suspension of deportations would allow the administration to review current practices and ensure “a fair and efficient immigration enforcement system focused on protecting the population. national security, border security and public security “.

Biden wastes no time naming officials to reverse Trump's immigration policy

The moratorium, which began last Friday – the day Paxton filed a lawsuit – excludes certain categories of individuals, including those who came to the United States after November 1, are suspected of terrorism or espionage or constitute a danger to national security, and waived rights to remain in the United States.

Paxton, who led an unsuccessful Supreme Court lawsuit challenging Biden’s electoral victory over Trump, argued the 100-day suspension violated federal procedural requirements and violated a pact the Trump administration made with Texas just before that Trump does not step down. He dictated that the Department of Homeland Security would consult with the state before changing certain immigration practices.

It is not clear whether such recent agreements with various states could be legally enforced. Tipton said he would need more time and additional legal information to look into the matter as he sets the 14-day temporary restraining order.

READ: Judge’s temporary order blocking Biden deportations stop

More importantly, Tipton agreed with Texas that the suspension appeared to violate the administrative procedure law’s guarantees against “arbitrary and capricious” executive action.

The January 20 memorandum “not only ignores potential policies that are more limited in scope and time, but it also fails to provide a concrete and reasonable justification for a 100-day break on evictions,” Tipton wrote.

John Roberts dodges the spotlight by skipping Trump's second impeachment trial

Tipton said Texas has shown the policy could hurt it because of the millions of dollars it spends on social services and other state benefits for undocumented immigrants.

Regarding the imposition of a national order, he wrote that “the 100-day break clearly affects national immigration policy, which demands uniformity.”

Federal judges often shudder at the idea that they would ideologically align themselves with the presidents who appointed them, and Chief Justice John Roberts famously responded to Trump’s denigration of “Judge Obama” with this bet. Caution: “We don’t have Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges.” What we have is an amazing group of dedicated judges who do their best to uphold the same law as those who appear before them. ”

Regardless of Roberts’ statement, the fact remains that Biden may find a court system skeptical.

Trump has occupied 177 of 682 district court judges and 54 of 179 appeals court judges, according to data compiled by Russell Wheeler of the Brookings Institution – in addition to the three new Supreme Court justices.

[ad_2]

Source link