[ad_1]
A federal judge in New York banned the Justice Department Tuesday from changing lawyers in a legal battle over Trump's administration efforts to add a citizenship issue to the 2020 census.
Judge Jesse Furman of the US District Court, appointed by Obama, said the government lawyers' motion for change was "patently flawed", except in the case of two lawyers who have already left the department or division. civil society that deals with the case.
"The defendants provide no reason, let alone" satisfactory reasons, "for the replacement of a board," wrote Furman.
THE GREATEST DEMOCRACIES ON APPROPRIATIONS TO THE CHAMBER WILL BE COMBINED TO OPPOSE THE QUESTION OF CITIZENSHIP TRUMP ON CENSUS
The Justice Department attempted to separate from its legal team on Monday after some of its lawyers appeared to drop the fight. Attorney General Bill Barr told the Associated Press that he had learned from a Defense Department attorney from the Department of Justice who was leading the litigation process that several people in the US Department of Justice said that he was not the only one in the US. team preferred not to continue.
The American Civil Liberties Union hailed Furman's decision in a statement made Tuesday.
TRUMP SLAMS "FAKE" REPORTS THAT QUESTION OF CITIZENSHIP IS COMPLETED
"The Justice Ministry needs to explain to the people and the courts its unprecedented replacement of the entire legal team that has been working on this case," said Dale Ho, director of the project "Human Rights." vote "of the ACLU. "The Trump administration acts as if it has something to hide, and we will not rest until we know the truth."
Trump pledged to continue his efforts to include the issue, even after the US Supreme Court temporarily barred him from introducing it. The president said that he would use his executive order power to add the question to the census.
Furman also asked how the Justice Department would meet deadlines if a group of new lawyers came forward, noting that government lawyers had three days to present their written submissions.
"As this court observed several months ago, this case was heard on the ground – based largely on the defendants' right[ence]"- that the prompt settlement of applicants' applications is a matter of great importance to both the public and the public," he wrote. "This urgency – and the need for effective court proceedings – has only grown since that time."
The judge ordered any lawyer from the Department of Justice who wishes to withdraw from the case to present an affidavit signed under oath with sufficient cause.
On Tuesday, the president criticized the Supreme Court on Twitter about the decision on the citizenship issue and its 2012 decision that maintained the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, which he tried to repeal.
"I have long heard that the appointment of Supreme Court justices was the most important decision of the President – SO REAL!" he posted.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
The Department of Justice did not immediately respond to a request for comments from Fox News.
[ad_2]
Source link