[ad_1]
The transcript shows Batten repeatedly hesitated over whether to grant redress to the Republican plaintiffs in the case, before ruling on the limited three-county remedy.
Powell and his colleagues initially wanted all of the state’s voting machines to be seized pending further legal action, but state attorneys said this would pose numerous problems, including preventing some local elections scheduled for this week and potentially interfere with the second round of the US Senate. elections scheduled for January 5.
“What the plaintiffs are essentially looking for is to remove certain voting equipment from the equation for the election scheduled for Tuesday, as well as the election scheduled for January 5.e, because the plaintiffs want us to own and essentially moth and preserve these machines at the county level – not in our possession, not in our care and control, ”Deputy Attorney General Russ Willard Sr. said in Batten.
“Regarding an election currently underway, he will throw sugar in the gas tank and erase the work.”
Batten appeared open to plaintiffs to conduct what he called a “quick inspection” of the machines, with Powell initially asking to examine the machines in 10 counties. She said “the bulk” of the inspections could be completed within three days.
When invoked by the judge, Powell released his startling statement that Dominion Voting Systems’ machines had been affected by an algorithm that drastically increased votes for Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden and knocked them out. reduced for Trump.
“It’s not just the data from the machines that is crucial in the case of fraud so prevalent across the country, it’s the fact that an algorithm we believe was uploaded to the Dominion machines that weighted the votes. for Mr. Biden on the votes for President Trump at about 1.22 to 0.78, and that’s what was crucial to make the evidence of the fraud absolutely inconclusive and irrefutable, ”Powell said.
Powell also claimed Dominion was doing the work of the late Venezuelan strongman Hugo Chavez. “It was designed and created by the Chavez regime for the sole purpose of ensuring that he wins future elections – as corrupt as possible,” she said.
Powell’s statements got even more extreme on Monday, as she retweeted a twitter message who called on Trump to declare an insurgency, halt the scheduled convening of the Electoral College in each state on Dec. 14, and use “military tribunals” to investigate alleged frauds related to the recently concluded election.
National and election officials said Powell’s claims about the company’s machines were absurd. And during Sunday’s hearing, his claims appeared to scold the state attorney.
“I’m sorry. I’m used to dealing with fact and law, not innuendo and accusation,” Willard replied. He went on to suggest that the kind of access Powell was demanding could put his experts in a position of commit fraud.
“It poses a security risk for Powell’s henchmen to go in and imagine everything, download the software and find a way to hack for future elections so their favorite candidates can win,” the representative said. attorney general’s office. “This is something that no federal court can accept.”
Yet Batten still seemed open to the idea, although he had admitted to both sides that he was back and forth on the matter.
“Although they make allegations of huge irregularities around the world regarding the Dominion’s voting machines, these allegations are supported by precious little evidence,” the judge said.
As Batten looked set to turn down the request for a TRO, Powell’s co-counsel Lin Wood spoke up and appeared to persuade the judge to freeze at least the machines in three counties for a possible inspection.
“I see no harm in the state keeping this information on a very limited basis,” Wood said.
Powell went on to call the proposal to inspect machines in Cobb, Gwinnett and Cherokee counties “the bare minimum.”
After Williard said he planned to call the 11e Circuit Court of Appeals, Batten ultimately agreed to simply order a machinery freeze in those three counties and to schedule an in-person hearing for Friday in Atlanta on whether to authorize an inspection of the machinery.
During the hearing, the judge also clarified that a pair of Wood guidelines posted online Sunday were “proposed draft orders” and not final orders in the case.
However, without mentioning Wood directly, Willard complained that the revelations were fueling the rumor mill.
“There have been a lot of rumors, innuendos and misinformation spread about what happened in a number of courts across the country, and this court today,” the deputy attorney general said. “There were a number of social media posts posted regarding this court’s indication on the two decisions.”
Batten offered no public criticism of Wood for posting the proposed orders the judge distributed to parties on Sunday.
As of Monday evening, no appeal had yet been filed in this case.
[ad_2]
Source link