[ad_1]
Werner Baumann on Roundup Rules
A Los Angeles jury returned Monsanto, owned by the German company Bayer AG, its first favorable verdict in the Roundup case after finding that exposure to the weedkiller was not a “substantial factor” in a little boy who has contracted a rare form of cancer.
Ezra Clark, now 10, was just 4 years old when he was diagnosed with Burkitt’s lymphoma. Her mother, Destiny Clark, says the child was exposed to the herbicide when she used the product on her lawn. She sued Monsanto, becoming one of some 125,000 plaintiffs who have gone to court to seek damages from the agrochemical company, claiming Roundup caused adverse health effects.
The Bayer AG logo is represented in the production plant of the Bayer Healthcare subgroup in Wuppertal, Germany. (REUTERS / Ina Fassbender / File Photo)
| Teleprinter | Security | Last | Switch | Switch % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAYRY | BAYER SA | 13.41 | -0.20 | -1.47% |
According to Reuters, Tuesday’s decision is the first jury verdict that Bayer has won in a Roundup case of the four that have been tried. Bayer has already settled around 96,000 cases since it acquired Monsanto three years ago.
Critics claim that the main ingredient in Roundup, glyphosate, is carcinogenic, while Bayer maintains that glyphosate has long been considered safe for use as a herbicide.
Roundup containers, left, a weedkiller is seen on a shelf with other products for sale in a hardware store (AP Photo / Reed Saxon)
$ 86M TO CONFIRMED CALIFORNIA COUPLE IN MONSANTO PESTICIDE CASE
Following Tuesday’s ruling, Bayer released a statement saying, “The jury’s verdict in favor of the company on causation is completing this lawsuit and is in line with assessments from expert regulators around the world as well as the overwhelming weight of four decades of in-depth science. “
The company added: “While we have great sympathy for Ezra Clark and his family, the jury carefully considered the science applicable to this case and determined that Roundup was not the cause of his illness.”
The Monsanto research farm is pictured near Carman, Manitoba, Canada. REUTERS / Zachary Prong / File Photo (Photo Reuters)
Fletcher Trammel, a lawyer for the Clarks, said he was considering appealing. “We are disappointed for the boy and his family,” the lawyer said in a statement. “We have several Roundup cases across the country over the next year and we look forward to trying them out.”
GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE
Law.com pointed out that three previous California jury trials against Monsanto over Roundup have yielded huge rewards for plaintiffs, including a “verdict of $ 289 million in 2018 reduced to $ 20.5 million on appeal, a reward of $ 80 million in 2019 lowered to $ 25.3 million, and a verdict of $ 2 billion in 2019 reduced to $ 86.7 million. “
[ad_2]
Source link