Justice Department Rejects Dem Who Jubilates About Agreement on Mueller Report: "It's Not a Blank Check"


Representatives of the Justice Department rejected the idea that a recent agreement with Jerrold Nadler, chairman of the Judiciary Committee of the House, would give Democrats unhindered access to documents from the former advisor's investigation. Special Robert Mueller on Russia.

A source familiar with the negotiations told Fox News on Tuesday that even though the agreement with Nadler, DN.Y., would allow members of his committee to examine some of the underlying evidence related to the Mueller report, it is not going to not have access to documents that he wants. "


"This is not a blank check. They can not see what they want, "the source told Fox News. "They have to tell us what they want to see and then we will consider that legitimate request. This is only the beginning of a process. "

The source also told Fox News that when Nadler asks for a document, the White House will have the opportunity to review the files to see if any White House actions are involved. At this point, President Trump would have the opportunity to assert the privilege of the leaders to protect them from their release.

This reaction comes after Nadler announced Monday the signing of an agreement with the Ministry of Justice regarding documents and evidence related to Mueller's investigation into whether the president was obstructing justice – an agreement prompting him to suspend his efforts to keep Attorney General Bill Barr in contempt, his colleagues in the House continue their contempt of Barr on two separate fronts this week.

Nadler, in his statement, called access to the key documents, while his fellow Democrats presented the deal as a victory over the Trump administration.

"I am pleased to announce that the Department of Justice has agreed to begin complying with our committee's subpoena by opening the most important files of Robert Mueller, providing us with essential evidence that the special counsel used to determine whether the president and others hindered justice. were involved in acts of misconduct, "said Nadler in his statement Monday. "These documents will enable us to fulfill our constitutional obligations and to decide how to proceed with the allegations made by the special council against the president."

Representative Sheila Jackson Lee, D-Texas, went so far as to claim that it was a "capitulation" of the GM and that the department began to open "all" documents that Democrats want to see.

The Ministry of Justice has agreed to give access to the files to Democrats and Republicans.

"Given our conversations with the department, I will suspend the criminal contempt process for the moment," Nadler said Monday. "We have agreed to give the department time to demonstrate that it is in compliance with this agreement. If the department is proceeding in good faith and we are able to get everything we need, there will be no need for further action. "

Nadler stated, however, that if "important information is withheld", the committee would have "no choice but to enforce our subpoena to appear in court and to consider". other solutions ".


Nadler's announcement comes after the Judiciary Committee voted in favor of Barr's conviction last month after the Justice Department failed to comply with a subpoena seeking access to an unedited version Mueller's report on Russia, as well as the underlying documents and evidence. President Trump also asserted the executive's privilege over the files in order to protect them from their publication.

However, at this point, House Democrats are still preparing to pass a separate resolution on contempt for subpoenas to Barr and former White House lawyer Don McGahn. The measure is scheduled for a ground action Tuesday.

Meanwhile, Nadler's committee, which would oversee any possible impeachment proceedings, searched for underlying evidence relating to Mueller's investigation into the obstruction of justice for months.

Last month, during his only public appearance as a special advocate, Mueller asserted that there was "no sufficient evidence to accuse of conspiracy" with respect to the issue of knowing whether members of the Trump campaign coordinated their activities with the Russian government during the 2016 presidential election.

But Mueller left open the question of whether the president was obstructing justice.

"If we had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so," Mueller said. "We did not determine if the president had committed a crime."

Fox News & # 39; Liz Friden contributed to this report.


Source link