[ad_1]
The Ministry of Justice, in new court records, has sought to block the Democratic Party's candidacy for Congress to obtain secret information about the grand jury of the Robert Mueller inquiry citing the confusion within the caucus as to whether or not to pursue an "indictment investigation".
In Friday's trial, the DOJ argued that the Judiciary Committee of the House was clearly not.
THE DEMS OF THE HOUSE MOVE
"The committee's description of its investigation clearly shows that it is too far removed from any potential legal process to qualify," said DOJ in a document filed Friday.
After a confused message, members of the Democratic Committee said last week that they were conducting an impeachment investigation, on the occasion of the first formal vote of the committee setting out the procedures to follow for these procedures and hearings.
In a related case, lawmakers sought disclosure of the grand jury's secret documents from Mueller's investigation. A small percentage of the report remains written because Grand Jury documents must remain secret according to the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, with a few exceptions. However, in a recent case before a court, the panel stated that its investigation of Trump's possible wrongdoing was within the exception for judicial proceedings, including the impeachment proceeding.
But the DOJ retorted that what the Democrats are doing is hardly such an investigation.
KAVANAUGH 'MUST BE INSPIRED,' TOP DEMS ', ABOUT RESTRACTION OF INCORRECT CLAIMS
The DOJ also quoted Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., Chair of the Judiciary Committee of the House, as saying:[a]n Imputation inquiry is when one considers only imputation. That's not what we do. "Since then, Nadler has investigated whether his committee's investigation is really an" indictment investigation ".
The developments come as President Trump Monday accused the committee of gagging their efforts. He then referred them to former President Barack Obama and to the old agreement between Michelle Obama and Netflix, as well as the 2017 Obamas book sales contract, as well as to the other. other contracts entered into by legislators.
MCCARTHY PROMISES RESPONSIBILITY AT BARR'S ARRIVAL IN FISA REPORT: "AS CLOSEST AS WE SEEN"
"House Judiciary has abandoned the Mueller report, unfortunately for them after two years and 40 million dollars spent – ZERO COLLUSION, ZERO OBSTRUCTION. So, they say, OK, let's look at everything else, and all the offers that "Trump" has made during his life. But it does not work that way, "tweeted Trump on Monday. "I have a better idea." Look at the Obama book deal or the ridiculous Netflix contract, then look at all the transactions concluded by the Dems in Congress, the "Congress Fund", and finally the IG reports. These surveys would be finished FAST!
The IG's reports include recently published findings that former FBI director James Comey broke the rules by handling memos documenting conversations with Trump. Another report, expected to be released in the near future, will discuss whether the FBI has acted inappropriately with respect to FISA warrant applications to monitor the campaign advisor's former page. Trump, Carter Page, at the beginning of the investigation conducted in Russia. Department of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz provided draft conclusions to Attorney General Bill Barr last week.
As for the Obamas, this is not the first time that Trump has hinted that their contract with Penguin Random House – which would have paid the former president and first lady more than $ 65 million for their memoirs – involved wrongdoing.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
"We want to know what happened with the last democratic president," Trump said in July. "Let's look at Obama as they look at me. From the first day, they looked at everything we did. They could look at the book deal that President Obama has concluded. Assign all his records. The president did not specify what such an investigation might find.
The Trump "Trump Congressional Fund" is a Treasury Department fund that has been used to pay millions of dollars in settlements to sexual harassment charges.
[ad_2]
Source link