Kavanaugh must be dismissed, say the Dems, while a new unsubstantiated allegation surfaced



[ad_1]

Kamala Harris and Julian Castro, two Top 2020 contenders, announced Sunday that Brett Kavanaugh, Associate Justice at the Supreme Court, "must be removed" following a new allegation of misconduct unsubstantiated and disputed sexual abuse against Kavanaugh, which surfaced in a New York Times article.

The revived, long-term attempt to get Kavanaugh out of the high court comes as the Democrats' attempt to oust President Trump is largely broken. Trump, for one, suggested that Kavanaugh should sue for defamation.

According to Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly of The Times, Max Stier, a classmate of Kavanaugh, the non-profit CEO connected to Clinton, saw Mr. Kavanaugh pull down the pants during a drunken drunken evening, where his friends penis in the hand of a student ".

"A PART OF WHAT MOTIVATED" CHRISTINE BLASEY FORD SHOULD PUT POLITICAL "ASTERISK" ON KAVANAUGH, AN ADMITTED LAWYER

According to the Times, Stier "informed the senators and the FBI of this account, but the FBI did not investigate and Mr. Stier refused to discuss it publicly".

But the Times article did not make it clear that Pogrebin and Kelly's book had also revealed that the student in question had denied knowing about the alleged episode.

"The book notes, in a low voice, that the woman named by Max Stier as having been alleged to be a victim of Kavanaugh and his friends denies any recollection of the alleged event," noted federalist Mollie Hemingway. "Seems, I do not know, significant."

"Omit these facts from the @New York Times History is one of the worst cases of journalistic misconduct I remember, "National Review correspondent John McCormack wrote on Twitter.

The Times later noted in the article that it "corroborated history with two officials who had contacted Mr. Stier," but the article apparently only meant that the Times had corroborated the Stier had claimed to the FBI. No first-hand corroboration of the alleged episode has apparently been obtained.

Nevertheless, the Democrats announced a new effort to overthrow Kavanaugh. To overthrow Kavanaugh, it would require a majority vote in the Democrat-controlled House, and an extremely improbable two-thirds vote in the GOP-majority Senate would then be required to remove him from office.

"I attended these hearings," Harris wrote on Twitter. "Brett Kavanaugh has lied to the US Senate and, more importantly, to the American people, has been put to court in a fictitious process and his place in the court is an insult to the search for truth and justice. must be removed. "

NEW YORK TIMES JOINS THE PENIS CALLING A TWEET CALLING A "FUN HARMLESS"

During the hearings, Harris strongly suggested that she knew that Kavanaugh had wrongly discussed the ongoing investigation of special advocate Robert Mueller with a Trump-related lawyer.

Harris provided no evidence of the insinuation of the bomb, which turned to social media and plunged the audience room into stunned silence, even as she directly accused Kavanaugh. to lie under oath.

Castro echoed this sentiment and stated that Kavanaugh had committed perjury.

"It's clearer than ever that Brett Kavanaugh lied under oath," Castro wrote. "He should be dismissed, and Congress should consider the failure of the Justice Department to properly investigate the case."

The Times article also stated that long before Kavanaugh became a federal judge, "at least seven people" had heard of how Kavanaugh would have exposed Deborah Ramirez at a party.

Ramirez had called her classmates to Yale to corroborate her story and had even told some of her classmates that she could not remember the culprit of the alleged episode – before she changed her mind and blamed Kavanaugh publicly "after six days spent carefully evaluating his memories and consulting his lawyer," reported the New Yorker last year in a largely ridiculous article.

The judicial panel then led by Senator Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, said in an executive summary of his investigation to have contacted Ramirez's lawyer "seven times to look for evidence to support the statements made in the New Yorker ", but" Ms. Ramirez has nothing in response and refused a request for the Committee's interview. "

In addition, the FBI separately contacted 11 people to corroborate the allegations of Ford and Ramirez, and finally met with ten people and two eyewitnesses. But the FBI found no corroboration.

Kavanaugh, predicted by the Democrats during his confirmation process, would be a radical conservative, often taken alongside liberal judges in the last term of the Supreme Court.

In the meantime, the president has accused the media of trying to influence justice. He also added that Kavanaugh should go on the offensive, attacking the media for false statements.

"Brett Kavanaugh should start suing people for defamation, otherwise the Justice Department should come to his rescue, the lies told about him are unbelievable, false accusations without recrimination, when does that stop? to influence his opinions, can not let this happen! "

Grassley sent several criminal cases to the Department of Justice regarding alleged lies submitted to Senate investigators during Kavanaugh's confirmation process – which could be what the President meant when he wrote Sunday that the DOJ "should come [Kavanuagh’s] to help. "

Ramirez was one of many women who had accused Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct during his confirmation process. Christine Blasey Ford testified that Kavanaugh had attempted to sexually assault her during a teen party. His lawyer, Debra Katz, reportedly stated in a new book that Ford was motivated to show up in part by his desire to mark Kavanaugh's reputation as an "asterisk" before he could begin to rule on abortion-related affairs.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

"In the aftermath of these hearings, I believe that Christine's testimony has brought more good than the harm caused by the misogynist Republicans caused by Kavanaugh's authorization on the ground," said Katz. "He'll always have an asterisk next to his name. When he will wear a scalpel to Roe v. Wade, we will know who he is, we know his character and we know what motivates him and it is important.

"It's important that we know, and that's part of what motivated Christine."

Ronn Blitzer of Fox News contributed to this report.

[ad_2]

Source link