Kelly Clarkson says Taylor Swift should re-register her catalog to find her masters.

For fans of Taylor Swift, the acquisition of the former label of the star, Big Machine Label Group, by Swift's longtime antagonist, Ithaca Holdings LLC, of ​​the Scooter Braun group, has created an ethical dilemma. Can the Swifties feel comfortable listening to the pre-Lover back catalog when they know that his royalties will flow into the coffers of a Swift man herself accused of "incessant, manipulative harassment"? Kelly Clarkson appealed to Twitter to make an interesting suggestion: that the pop star re-record and re-release her first albums in order to get rid of Braun's property.

Braun, who is well known in the music industry for leading Kanye West to the rapper rapper's heyday with Swift, now owns master recordings of the entire six-album catalog of Swift. Band of music in 2018. Swift is known for denouncing unfair conditions in the music industry and lamented the purchase of his work by Braun in a post on Tumblr, the "caller" my worst case scenario ", and the product of an industry led by executives for whom" The term "loyalty" is clearly only a contractual concept. "The media landscape of celebrities is actually fractured between the Braun and Swift camps. Many pop artists have joined Swift to denounce the power of labels on an artist's work.

The best of movies, television, books, music and more, aired three times a week.

This is not the first time that an artist threatens to re-register his catalog in order to circumvent the property of the label. Prince threatened to follow a similar route during a dispute over a label that ultimately lasted 18 years and saw the artist change his name to become a symbol of protest. Indeed, the artist published a recording of "1999" shortly after Warner Bros. distributed a single version to radio stations. From Chuck Berry to Tracy Chapman, through Def Leppard and Jojo, there is a long history of artists re-recording their hits to renegotiate their rights and claim their copyrights.

Swift's status and voice in the music industry have made her a sort of Prince, although I doubt she will go so far as to change her name for the conflict. (If she did, it would surely be an emoji.) It would certainly be interesting to see how a 2019 Taylor Swift would address her national early career successes and that a change on her part could inspire a change in practice in the world. # 39; industry. It would not be the first time.