[ad_1]
Legal back and forth between Kelly Clarkson and ex-husband Brandon Blackstock is growing increasingly strained after the former American Idol’s legal team responded to Blacksock’s denial that he and his father defrauded Clarkson over charges. millions.
Clarkson and Blackstock have been waging a legal war against each other since October, when Kelly’s former Stepfather Narvel Blackstock has filed a lawsuit alleging that she still owed them $ 1.5 million in commissions and $ 4 million on her paycheck for trying The Voice.
Kelly fought back with a counter-suit, saying her deal with the Blackstocks and their company Starstuck Entertainment should be rescinded and that she should be reimbursed for all prior charges because they were providing ‘illegal services’ under of the Talent Agencies Act of California for working without a license and not acting in the “best interests” of their client.
“ We stand by our claims that Starstruck violated the talent agency law, despite their standard denials, and look forward to hearing the case before the labor commissioner in August, ” the Clarkson team said. in a new statement to Entertainment Tonight.
Stand up: Kelly Clarkson’s camp has doubled the number of allegations that her ex-husband Brandon Blackstock defrauded her millions of people during her tenure as manager, telling ET that they are ‘standing by’ their claims while rejecting Blackson’s “ standard denials ”. Above 2020
Blackstock has completely denied Clarkson’s accusations in the November California Labor Board filings that were released online Tuesday.
He disputed claims that he and his father scammed the artist by adding exorbitant fees to his company Starstruck Entertainment’s invoices.
But Brandon’s attorneys Bryan J. Freedman and Jesse A. Kaplan have argued that they are not subject to California’s talent agency law because they did not do their work in the Golden State. .
Kelly’s attorney, Edwin McPherson, believes the former American Idol is entitled to all the money and other “ things of value ” Brandon paid for. while acting as his agent.
Legal representation for the Blackstocks further alleged any alleged violation that there is a one-year statute of limitations in the talent agency law, which means that even if Clarkson could prove his charges, it is possible for its lawyers to argue that it can only claim commissions paid in the year. before its October 2020 filing.
Blackstock is asking that Clarkson’s petition be dismissed and that she pay her legal fees.
Clarkson and Blackson’s legal battle began when Stepfather Narvel Blackstock filed a lawsuit against her last October with allegations that she still owed them $ 1.5 million in commissions, in addition to the additional $ 4 million she owed them in because of his role as a judge in The Voice.
His side: Blackstock denies accusations he defrauded the star by acting as his agent during their relationship. In the 2020 photo above
Different rulebook: Lawyers for Blackstock and Father Narvel say they are not subject to California talent agency law and if they were a one-year statute of limitations, the amount of restitution that Kelly could recover. Above Narwhal, Kelly and Brandon are seen with Elder Blackstock’s ex-wife Reba McEntire
Kelly then counterattacked, asking for the deal to be rescinded, for all past payments made by Clarkson to be refunded, and for all other payments to the company to be stopped.
” On the basis of the wrongful acts and the conduct [Starstruck Management and the Blackstocks] … all agreements between the parties are to be declared void and unenforceable, no monies are to be paid by the petitioners to the defendants, and all monies previously paid by the petitioners to the defendants are to be immediately returned to the defendants, ”the petition states. .
Clarkson’s petition claims Starstruck demanded “ unreasonable costs and compensation … for illegal services ”, acted “ in conflict of interest with the best interests of the petitioners ” and gave “ false information ”.
The petition also alleges that Starstruck made false statements and / or withheld important information from [Clarkson] concerning certain matters relating to [Starstruck’s] undertaking, ”which was“ in violation of section 1700.32 of the California Labor Code ”.
Clarkson also alleges that the company failed to obtain his written approval to act as an agent.
Bryan Freedman, an attorney for Starstruck, told TMZ of the filing: ‘The Labor petition conveniently ignores the fact that Kelly had her own CAA licensed talent agency at all times. While Starstruck Management Group provided talent management services on his behalf, it did so at all times as CAA was his go-to agency.
Tit for tat: The Clarkson and Blackson legal battle began when stepfather Narvel Blackstock filed a lawsuit against her last October with allegations that she still owed them $ 1.5 million in commissions, in over an additional $ 4 million she was willing to pay it off as a result of her role as judge in The Voice
Family ties: Clarkson shares daughter River Rose and son Remington Alexander with ex
‘It is unfortunate that Kelly is again attempting to avoid paying commissions due and owed to Starstruck in an attempt to gain a perceived advantage in her ongoing custody and divorce proceedings. ”
The legal battle is just the latest development in the midst of the ongoing divorce between Kelly and Brandon.
After seven years of marriage and two children together, the couple broke up in the summer of 2020.
Kelly married Brandon at Blackberry Farm in Tennessee in 2013, and together they welcomed daughter River Rose, six, and son Remington Alexander, four.
Kelly has since been granted primary physical custody of their two children.
The judge’s custody ruling prompted Blackstock to file additional legal documents Monday asking for $ 436,000 a month in support payments from Clarkson.
He is asking for $ 301,000 in spousal support and $ 135,000 in child support, according to TMZ.
He also requested that his future ex-wife cover $ 2 million in legal fees.
Happier times: Clarkson with Brandon, their two children and children from a previous marriage
[ad_2]
Source link