[ad_1]
Emily in Paris.
Photo: Netflix / YouTube
On February 21, the Los Angeles Times published a report on the alleged “ethical conflicts” and a “culture of corruption” within the Hollywood Foreign Press Association, the highly influential 87-member nonprofit business organization that hosts and votes the annual Golden Globe Awards for cinema and television. One element of the survey is “Hollywood’s widely held perception that members can still be pushed around and influenced with special attention,” one pricing consultant calling the HFPA a “good target” for the awards campaign because ‘they are so small.
In an example of the “hotel stays, dinners and other gifts” that the voters of the Globes receive, the Times wrote about how in 2019 Paramount Network treated over 30 Golden Globe voters Emily in Paris fixed tour which included “a two-night stay at the five-star Peninsula Paris, where rooms currently start at around $ 1,400 a night, and a press conference and lunch at the Musée des Arts Forains, a private museum filled with rides. to 1850 when the show was on. (Emily in Paris was originally designed for Paramount Network before Netflix bought it in 2020.) “They treated us like kings and queens,” said a member who attended the junket, which was also attended by other non-HFPA media. “
This news comes after many followers of the awards season, including a staff writer on Emily in Paris, expressed bemusement and disappointment that the intermediate series was nominated for best TV comedy out of more acclaimed series. It also comes after Norwegian journalist Kjersti Flaa’s antitrust lawsuit was dismissed against the HFPA in November.
[ad_2]
Source link