[ad_1]
Eko Osta, who is responsible for hazardous waste, who has filed a lawsuit against the contractor Skonto Būve, will continue to seek all possible legal remedies to do his job three years ago, according to information provided by Eko osta.
Eko Osta has appealed in court, as one of Latvia's largest construction contractors with tens of millions of euros in annual turnover, has long been unable to cover its obligations to a subcontractor. Eko Osta filed an insolvency petition for the company's work as part of the design and rehabilitation work of the State Environmental Service (VVD) Basin Supply Department Incukalns Sulfur Gutter "Contaminated Site". The contract between Eko osta as a subcontractor and Skonto Būve as a general contractor was concluded on 7 October 2014. All the work provided for in the contract was implemented in the required amount and on schedule already in 2015. "Skonto būve" debts to Eko osta is 1.89 million euros.
"In his press release, Skonto Bûve, indicates that the work for which Eko osta is required to pay is part of the work on which The contracting authority – the VVD – did not pay the contractor General Skonto Būve and legal proceedings were initiated for the payment of this sum According to the information available to Eko osta, one of the subcontractors – the German company MUEG GmbH – performs at the same time works. "Skonto būve "is perceived as a disputed and subject period, full remuneration was paid, which Skonto Būve paid, obviously not wanting international legal proceedings," said Una Vaičulēna, a lawyer with the company "Eko osta"
. It is an unfortunate practice that some construction companies in the initial phase of supply to win the offer reduces the value of their offer, but thereafter can not ķināties with subcontractors, which delay or pay for honest and quality do the job. A small or medium-sized business has a difficult legal way of dealing with large general contractors who have significantly higher resources, including well-paid lawyers.
The claim submitted to the court of "Eko osta" was based on an badysis by economists: "Skonto Būve" is more likely to have a financial difficulty in liquidating his debts, thus justifying the continuation of the procedures of Insolvency in court.
The company also believes that the announcement by the media of the "Skonto būve" of threats to go to the prosecutor's office to initiate criminal proceedings against the shareholders of "Eko osta" for the deliberate misrepresentation of 39, an insolvency petition to the court, is unfounded. "The pursuit to enforce their rights can not pose a threat to the criminalization of defamation, as this tactic of public intimidation was characteristic of the 90th criminal group rather than a modern socially responsible society," says Vaičuleins
"Eko osta". entrepreneurs who had come into contact with Skonto Bûve or other unscrupulous entrepreneurs who owe their money to fight together against the right to receive compensation for honest work.
Recall that the district court of Zemgale in Jelgava construction "of insolvency proceedings after the application of" Eko osta ", but on July 6, the court l & 39; rejected
Source link
