[ad_1]
At the time when Imants Kalniņš also participated in the public debate on Evija Weber, the Cehs.lv blogger badociation could no longer react, as it is clear that we already have a lot of opinions. That's why we think it's a good time to badytically badyze what celebrities have so far been asking to try to understand: the song, "Holiday," has been interpreted as good or bad ? It could not be that all the enemies with implicit phrases, not to mention the song played in the concert.
The fact that his performance is controversial is a fact – even in a completely different way, the collective opinion of Cehs.lv is shared. In preparation for this article, I interviewed about 10 authors and, in most cases, the opinion ranged from "no matter" to "What is Evija Weber?"
Let's start with the essentials. The song of Eugene Weber is unknowingly comparable to Olga Rajecke's original "Day of Celebration". Olga himself, Facebook, left two comments. Namely, "I look and see," and also, "No, I miss this concert, and if I sing it in my youth, everyone will escape." [“Cehs.lv” redakcija atļāvās Olgas komentārā ievietot pieturzīmes ērtākai lasīšanai.]
First of all, if we are talking about songs, we propose to listen to Olgu in 1985. Links here.
Second, it turns out that – yes, Imka watched. It's in the video commentary against Evija's vocals, but Cehs.lv's artificial intelligence lab does not much trust this factor. Imants Kalnins has already liked ideas such as the idea of leaving the European Union or, for example, Vladimir Putin. Yes, of course, Imants Kalniņš is much more reliable than a musician, not a political scientist. However, even in this regard, we see potential for engagement, each being aware of its close creative relationship with Shipsea. In this case, Weber's defense could actually be that of Shipsea. We think that in fact, Imantam is simply indifferent and that the small video clip posted on Shipsea's Facebook profile was not Kalnina's initiative.
Since Shipsea is one of the main authors of the concert, his responsibility is to defend it. It makes sense to mobilize friends and resources. Certainly, in Shipsea's own publication, shortly after the rise of indignation, certain places could be interpreted as a justification for a speech: the whole day of trials, in cold weather, and so on.
Uldis Rudaks is one of the lawyers of Evii Weber. Certainly he is less likely to talk about a live performance of the song "Festive Day" at the LNB, but more of the peculiarities of his voice. In this respect, I tend to disagree, but Rudaka's defense is inappropriate because no one has really attacked his album "Sirdsvat", and she also has not been conceptually accused of lack of musicality. It was the fact that the song in question in the concert in question was terrible. For Uldis has commented less, not to say that he has not commented at all.
The "Delfi" version of Andres Freidenfeld seemed the most resonant. First, he stresses the extreme political correctness of the entertainment offered to consumers. I do not know This seems to me to be a contradiction: if a person evaluates the performance of Evija Vebere as a fight, then it is not politically correct.
Fred also points out that brave projects could not come from the stagnation of modern perceptions, because everything should be neat, correct and understandable. In this sense, Andrew has not seen Roja Roger's blog nor listened to "Singapore Sateen" nor read "Cehs.lv" for a moment. Examples can be hundreds. Granted, the radio shows may not be as interesting as before, but one of the explanations is that the radio only listens to a handful of cars and cafes, but real life has long been on the Internet. And there is no courage to blame. However, I agree that a band of interesting live music and high quality in the rock genre is becoming increasingly rare and it is really sad.
In addition, Freidenfeld lists legendary (mostly rock) artists, who were originally hedgers, but who eventually proved that the critics had made mistakes. Elvis, Frank Zap, The Doors, Bloody and even Sid Viches. Yes, I can not disagree. C & # 39; was. But Andris sets a very high standard for Evija Weber. All the musicians named by Fred were warm and then proved themselves. Evija has now gained some share in the skins, but the legendary status remains to be won. In this respect, I think that with this argument, the singer is eager.
What needs to be experienced – yes. We do not talk about it. Each thing has its own place and its own time, plus the ability to recognize mistakes is part of experimentation and courage. "Led Zeppelin", having failed at the first concert after the death of the drummer, admitted that it was a terrible experience and did not do it before 22 years old, until he plays his last reunion concert the most likely.
Having read the points of view and knowing that most of the lawyers did not advocate the "Feast Day", but that of Weber, as well as the fact that Shipsea included part of the justification in his eyes, offered a summary. You can accept it, you can take it.
An interpretation experience of "Celebration" has failed and can only be understood by relatives who are currently in the public space. But Evija Vobere, with her specific tone of voice, has the potential to succeed in music. Granted, comparing it to Elvis is too early.
PS If Shipsea thinks I am mistaken conceptually, then I suggest going to the next step and, in a match of the Latvian hockey team, talk to Vebere for his interpretation of the game. ;National anthem.
P.P.S. I deliberately did not say that concert expenses were covered by taxpayer money because it had nothing to do with the musical interpretation of the "Holiday". Similarly, 180,000 are not really a sum if we keep in mind that 100,000 states have given Andris Kivičs the opportunity to make themselves known in the "Rampas gaismas" of "TV24" in the tunes, then join the party "KPV LV", so that even after it would not be in the Saeima and, after all, would bring it to her. It is a huge amount of money.
Source link
