Chief KNAB does not understand the case of non-exhaustion of several old cases / Article / LSM.LV



[ad_1]

Inventory of the immediate operations of the Office of Prevention and Fight against Corruption (KNAB), J thekabs Straum did not understand why, by obtaining evidence or indications of other necessary actions, the authorities often did not receive not an adequate response from the staff.

Straume, in an interview with Ir magazine, acknowledged that he had made a small inventory of what the Bureau had done in recent years, and therefore before he took office at the head of the institution. In the inventory process, Straume did not detect any cases where something was done illegally.

However, he was confused as to why, during the operational activity, he was getting evidence or indications of work. . "It is possible for me to ask Mr. Jarras the opportunity [bijušajam KNAB Operatīvo izstrāžu nodaļas vadītājam Jurim] But it is clear that we continue to work – both with what is happening now and with historically derived materials," Straume confirms. an interview with the magazine

. The charges brought against the President of the Bank of Latvia, Ilmars Rimšēvičs and the entrepreneur Marim Martinson, are the result of the inventory of old things

"The employees to whom he was entrusted came and reported – yes, here is one or the other case not investigated "He also explained that the KNAB chief

also stated that the most important part in the pursuit of Rimševicas and Martinson was the testimony of two people and discussions in the Butterfly Sauna in 2013, four months later, while pursuing the investigation. Evidence

The question whether KNAB continues to operate also Janis Miķelsons, who resides in 2014 A search was carried out in the framework of the case of Martinson or the builders, because Michael Anne Dišereite, official, accountant at Martinson told Straume magazine that he had no right to comment, but in general "any indication of officials inconsistent with the position they occupy carefully evaluated."

"This This issue is not only a question of KNAB competence Clearly, the office needs to check if its officials are honest But at the same time, absolutely all employees have received special permissions to work These permits are issued by the Office of Constitutional Protection, which badesses each of them.This case, when last week , it was reported that the office worker was guilty of leaking information and caused a failure of a criminal trial, must be verified, "said Straume in an interview with" Yes "

The former boss of the operational development division of KNAB, the current opposition member of the Riga City Council on Twitter microblogging website, has been involved in the business of "Builders" and Rimsevic, which has not been successful in the past

The KNAB sent criminal files to the Office of the Prosecutor for the initiation of criminal proceedings against the President of the Bank of Latvia Rimsev. On 18 June, the KNAB sent criminal files to the Office of the Prosecutor. and the businessman Martinson Shortly after, the prosecutor's office in the case of Rimshevich was indicted for accepting bribes, and Martinson – for having supported pots-of-wine wine. This may be punishable by a term of imprisonment of three to eleven years.

Attorney General Viorika Jirgena previously stated that the CPCB had taken action against the shareholders of the two shareholders of AS Trasta komercbanka (TKB). Both shareholders appeared in the case as bribes but were released from criminal liability because they voluntarily contacted law enforcement with information about the case. ;event.

Yergen said that one of the shareholders had appealed to Rimsevich in 2010. Capital Markets Commission (FCMC), in exchange for offering Rimšēvičs paid leisure trip to Kamchatka. In 2012, this shareholder, along with another, will turn to Rimsevich again, asking for help on other issues related to the FCMC. Rimsevich asked for 500,000 euros in payment, one in advance and one in the FCMC 's decision

The prosecutor pointed out that after the 2010 agreement, Rimsevics repeatedly advised him to pay the fees. TKB shareholder to influence the decisions of the FCMC. Such consultations also took place after the 2012 agreement, although, despite the fact that Rimsevic was able to influence the FCMC to make decisions supposedly favorable to TKB, they also adopted unfavorable decisions. As a form of badistance provided by Rimsevich, the attorney mentioned help in responding to questions raised by the FCMC regarding bank liquidity and non-resident issues.

Jirgen explained that Rimsevich did not fully respond to his request. 000 euros. According to the Crown, Martinson played an intermediary role in this criminal offense – he received 10% of the total amount of the bribe. The prosecutor added that the bribery was made in cash.

[ad_2]
Source link