[ad_1]
In the Riga District Court, the portal "Delfi" indicated that questions about the court's decision would only be dealt with on Monday.
It has been previously stated that Gulams Mohammed Gulami and his wife Valentīna Gulami and Larisa Karpenko are sitting on the dock.
Gulamam Aliyev sentenced to eight years imprisonment, his wife was sentenced to seven years, while Karpenko was sentenced to five years imprisonment, informed the lawyer
As indicated, the prosecutor's office of Riga has previously accused three people for more than nine million dollars of the disappearance of the cotton cargo of Tajikistan. Persons held criminally responsible for the misappropriation, falsification of documents and the use of false documents.
2015. In the summer of 2007, the case was brought to court, where it was decided to see it in camera. None of the defendants were guilty of blaming her.
Gulami, as stated, regards this criminal case as a political order. Previously, Gulami explained that in October 2012, WEESA had received the task "Logistic-Ekspress" – a request for transport of a cargo that was physically located in the customs warehouse "WEESA" in Jurmala in the United States on behalf of Logistic-Ekspress This task, as Gulami showed, was signed by the chairman of the Board of Logistic-Ekspress and the sole proprietor Andrey Stepovoy, a Ukrainian citizen in moment of the transaction. But already in December 2012, the citizen of Tadjikistan Davlathon Azizov took his place in the Estonian company Logistic-Ekspress. In February 2013, an Estonian company filed an application with the Riga Regional Court against WESA for the badignment of a cargo and the obligation to transfer the goods, stating that WEEAA did not allow an expert company to check the presence and condition of the cotton fiber. Logistic-Ekspress thought WEESA unlawfully owned the applicant's cargo
The court, on the other hand, decided to close the case, stating that "the Estonian company Logistic-Ekspress" was losing the right to claim cargoes of cargo. cotton litigious. "
Gulami He added that it was not known that the Logistic-Ekspress forwarder would have made claims against the addressees or the management of a former Estonian company, and that Tajikistan would have provided Latvia with a note concerning the disappearance of the cargo of cotton.As a result, he was convinced that this criminal proceeding was a political order.
The case before the transfer to the prosecutor's office was the object of A State Police (VP) investigation, the Economic Council for Crime Prevention (ENAP) .VP application was received in this case in spring 2014. The request indicated that 80 wagons of fiber from cotton of almost 7000 tons had disappeared, while total losses were estimated at 9 million euros.
During a thorough investigation, ENAP staff found that the cumulative cotton was committed by a falsified group of people In the case of the change of cargo owner, criminal proceedings are therefore qualified for both misappropriation and falsification of documents.
Source link