[ad_1]
On Thursday, July 5, the members of the European Parliament rejected the intention of the relevant parliamentary committee to authorize negotiations with national ministers to begin updating the rules of the right of defense. contradictory author. The general public has only become aware of the regulations at the present time, and its meaning is unclear.
The EP Information Office in Latvia informed that there were 278 MEPs in plenary session, but 318 MEPs opposed and abstained by 31 votes. As a result, the draft terms of reference approved by the Legal Affairs Committee on 20 June were rejected. This means that the EP will debate and vote on the amendments to Parliament's position in September.
In the current European Union, the Copyright Regulation was adopted 17 years ago – at a time when the Internet phenomenon only existed in childhood . For two years, there has been talk of the need to adopt a new regulation that would also apply to the Internet environment. The goal of the law is to fight against piracy and provide fair wages to artists and journalists for works published on the Internet.
This reform is necessary to put an end to the exploitation of European artists on the Internet. US platforms such as Google and Facebook are earning huge profits from writers in Europe, "said Aksels Voss, the designer.
This seemingly intentional intent has provoked resistance from the Internet giants The regulation would prevent websites such as Google and Facebook from publishing unauthorized content as well as sharing content created by other organizations, such as media reports
This means that content should be filtered or censored automatically in advance, so the threat to the freedom of the Internet – this will significantly limit the availability of information.Most of all this could endanger the so-called Internet of dreams and remixes of music Politically sensitive content may also be compromised, which may be used as a pretext to censor the copyright law.
"l im pact of the Freedom of Expression Directive raises concerns. This is a source of concern for both the United Nations experts and for the Internet inventor himself. Citizens are also worried – yesterday, I received a petition signed by nearly one million people, "said rapporteur Katarina Štilere
Publishers defend the regulation and claim that # 39, it is necessary to ensure the survival of traditional media. On the other hand, MEP Inese Vaidere told Latvian radio that big Internet companies had spent nearly 60 million euros for a large-scale electoral campaign, but that many MPs had received Hundreds and thousands of emails to reject the draft directive. Inese Vaidere MEP Uģis Lībietis
