[ad_1]
Photo: Shutterstock
From 6 April 2016, the Member States of the European Union decided to reform the fundamental data protection system by adopting a series of reforms in the field of data protection. data protection. is covered by the General Data Protection Regulation. Two years have gone into the preparation of the new Regulation, the evaluation of the system for the collection, storage and processing of personal data in each country, including Latvia, and its compliance with the Regulation.
25. The month of May has already pbaded, but in trying to understand how our hunters will change or change after the entry into force of the regulation, we are convinced that the responsible authorities have only managed to work that day. at the last minute …
What is personal data?
First and foremost, it must be understood that personal information is a variety of information that can be identified by identifying a particular person. The most common, but not the only information, is the name, the first name, the personal identity number. Likewise, personal data is an address, a license number, any other factor (physical, physiological, genetic, spiritual, economic, cultural or social) allowing the identification of the individual.
An ammunition store and a shooting range
Where does the hunter deal with computer in the daily routine, if we do not talk about the process in which he becomes a hunter, receives permits, certificates? Well, even with the purchase of ammunition, the ammunition registry data clearly identify the individual: name, surname, address, personal identification number, authorization number of the 39; Weapon (Council of Ministers Regulation No. 1001 on the Acquisition, Registration and Registration of Weapons and Ammunition), Storage, Transport, Transfer, Transport, Transportation 39, disposal and storage of weapons collections). It's also like visiting a shooting range or a shooting competition. Are these data sufficiently protected within the meaning of the Regulation and their collection is legally justified, as required by the Regulation? Not enough if we present a valid certificate accompanied by a personal identification document? Is the data securely deleted (destroyed) after the deadline, as required by the entry into force of the Regulation? Why should a company accumulate data on people who buy ammunition, essentially becoming the subject of personal data processing?
In theory, it is acceptable for personal data recorded in newspapers to be accessible to third parties. At this moment, skeptics will say that with a personal code and a name, a last name without any additional identifier, you can not start a big deal if only to fill an unhealthy fantasy in your mind. And yet, regulation is strictly defined: these two data together make it possible to identify one person or another.
Ministries are in no hurry
To clarify the situation, we asked the Ministry of the Interior, whose subordinate state institutions deal with the issue of the circulation of arms. The ministry was redirected to the state police, from which we received a message that the supervisors themselves were still unclear: "2018. The minutes of March 6 (minutes no. 40, No. 40) provides that ministries will badess, by 1 December 2018, whether the normative acts of the sector concerned providing for the processing of personal data meet the requirements of the General Data Protection Regulation, and, if necessary to draft laws and regulations and submit them for Cabinet consideration in due course.In this process, it will also be examined whether the data processing examples mentioned in the question comply with the provisions of the General Regulation on Data protection: "It's so simple." Instead, ask if government officials were hoping the regulation would be repealed, is it still a failure? Will it pbad until December of this year?
Waiting for court decisions
In the presence of a seminar for life, the idea crystallized the expectation of the population's response to the processing of personal data, the trials and judicial decisions that would allow for relevant amendments to the regulations. But paying for the lack of imaginative officials and reluctance to embark on long-term business, if you succeed, will also be a public authority (let us, the taxpayers). Do we deserve to make small profits after our taxes? The Code of Administrative Offenses penalizes the illegal processing of personal data up to EUR 14 000. Maybe the state intends to supplement this budget? And where else could be additional requirements? Enough to completely destroy a smaller host
How to manage a hunting area?
However, the entry of a personal code and a license number in a more or less truncated magazine is the smallest problem. When hunting in the hunting district, it is impossible to dispense with the conclusion of hunting rights leases, which is one way or another, the collection and processing of data. personal, including storage. Harald Barwick, chairman of the board of directors of the Latvian Hunters' Association, believes that the problem of the external borders of hunting districts in Latvia, which is extremely resolute, will become even more relevant in this regard. It will be impossible to formally find the owner because it is necessary to reveal personal data – a set of information that can identify and find a particular person to prepare and conclude an agreement. Until now, this news gathering has been working in the gray area. Here, you will have to find a solution by modifying the norms of the hunting law. "It is not a normal situation that it is impossible to legally find a landowner, the owner of the land changes, but no one informs him and the hunter becomes an offender under the laws of In addition, the inspector is right and he is not interested in the peripheries with the transfer of landowners and hunting rights and the protection of personal data, "said Mr. Barvika
Naivi hopes that all the owners will go to the appropriate authorities and want to allow the hunters to provide data needs.There are even more questions in place of the answers quoted – both about things that are directly related to hunting and the overall implementation of the regulations Clearly, one thing is that the public does not really know where, why, why or not, it is not clear if the person asking for the information is right to ask. All this suggests that there will be a storm of lawsuits that will be caused by the delay of state officials.
Read more in the June issue of the journal Hunting
Recommend this article to others
[ad_2]
Source link
