[ad_1]
People have responded faster than politicians to the work of the Emergency Medical Assistance Service (NMPD). The number of calls has decreased and the number of consultations has increased, revealed an interview with Liepaja Cipule, director of the Latvian radio program, "said at a crossroads".
She said that some callers said right away that they wanted advice on how to get a health care service. "We understand that we can not impose a burden on society that she does not know who to turn to for help without receiving timely advice." 50% of calls are not urgent appeals. Being able to provide a service, we have to work ourselves – we come from other areas so that people do not have to endure, "Cipule said. The NMPD official also indicated that the service had begun to profile the brigades, taking into account the differences in the importance of the calls.
In addition, the Ombudsman, Juris Jansons, considered that the situation with the NMPD confirmed that the phase of primary health care was not working, because people were confused and did not know in which cases it was possible to do without calling the DPLM. As a result, a considerable burden is placed on the service. For his part, Andris Skride, chairman of the Commission on Human Rights and Public Affairs, said that it was necessary to change their thinking a few years ago when the service s & # 39; Called ambulance. The main task of the NMPD is to help patients in life-threatening conditions.
CONTEXT:
In early November, the Emergency Medical Service (NMPD) announced the establishment of the Emergency Medical Service in the Riga Regional Center. Fifteen days later, the minutes were written by 15 people. Doctors are not happy with low wages, uncertainty about next year's pay rise and overtime.
An emergency situation means that calls to the NMPC in the Riga area that do not endanger the life or health of people could be refused. The situation is complicated by the uncertainty surrounding the increase in medical treatments starting next year.
The Constitutional Court ruled that the remuneration for the normal periodicity of medical treatment prescribed by the Medical Treatment Law did not comply with the principle of equality established in the Satversme. The court judgment means that as of January 1 of the following year, doctors, like all workers, are entitled to a fair remuneration or double pay for overtime. The case was initiated by the mediator.
The law on overtime should double. However, during the 2009 crisis, the media was renamed as an extension of normal working time and payment is only slightly above the base rate.
[ad_2]
Source link
