[ad_1]
The sanction was granted on the basis of an agreement reached with the prosecutor by a prosecutor.
Another SRS investigator involved in this crime, against whom a separate criminal complaint was filed. In the present case, the Supreme Court (AT) abolished the sentence in the second instance and remitted it to the Riga Regional Court.
The judgment states that in 2008, the convicted person met a contractor who requested tax badistance taxable transaction documents for transactions that were not made and transfer amounts of money. Money with VAT to companies registered in the enterprise register on the basis of documents containing false and false information, not practicing the spirit of business and avoiding paying 7,627,118 lats (10,852 412 euros)
According to the AT judgment, the businessman was actually an operational officer who conducted an operational experiment
. During the criminal activity, the convict used the SRS tax information system to obtain information on several companies that would be used for the tax evasion scheme
For participation in the scheme, both Former SRS investigators were waiting to receive a reward of 750,000 lats (1,067,153.86 euros), but up to their detention by the Corruption Prevention Authority. and the Combat Bureau (KNAB), they were able to receive only 3 400 lats (4 837 euros) each.
According to the judgment, former SRS employees gave quick instructions for the system of fraudulent tax evasion to work properly. companies must change their manager and conduct other activities for the commission of a criminal offense, the operational agent has not committed any activity for committing a criminal offense, but has led to the belief that to the two criminals that they had followed their advice.
Source link
