[ad_1]
Britney Spears’ father’s legal team tries to ravage the #FreeBritney tale that vilified him as the singer’s guardianship case persisted, insisting that James “Jamie” Spears loves his daughter and wants what ‘there is better for her.
But #FreeBritney advocates don’t have it.
“I understand every story wants to have a villain, but people are so wrong here,” Jamie’s attorney Vivian Lee Thoreen said Thursday during a virtual appearance on ABC News’s “Good Morning America”.
Holland & Knight’s attorney defended Elder Spears’ role as curator for the 39-year-old artist – known in some states as legal guardian – despite renewed scrutiny of the movement-catalyzed extended arrangement viral #FreeBritney and the New York Times this month. and the FX documentary “Framing Britney Spears”.
In addition, Thoreen, who specializes in complex issues of trust, inheritance, guardianship and guardianship, participated in the documentary on the hitmaker “Baby … One More Time” before joining the legal team of the elder Spears last year. In the documentary, she said she has never seen a person successfully come out of a guardianship.
“It’s the story of an extremely loyal, loving and dedicated father who saved his daughter from a life threatening situation. People harmed him and exploited him, ”Thoreen said on“ GMA ”.
This is why the guardianship was first put in place in 2008 following the public collapse of the “toxic” singer after her divorce from her husband Kevin Federline, a bitter custody battle and very hospitalizations. publicized, Thoreen said. This enabled her father to make personal, medical and financial decisions for the artist struggling with a probate arrangement usually used with the elderly or infirm.
“Jamie saved Britney’s life,” Thoreen said, adding that the singer’s assets “were clearly mismanaged and that she was being financially exploited by some of her entourage,” Thoreen said.
Thoreen said Elder Spears took the singer’s $ 2.8 million fortune to nearly $ 60 by collaborating with her and allowing her, she added.
“He worked with her to help her regain custody of her children. He brought his finances back from the disaster, ”she added. “And he created a safe environment for her to live her life as she sees fit, far from the media that causes her so much suffering.
But the legal arrangement took a sharp turn last summer.
It was then that Spears’ attorney, Samuel D. Ingham III, told court in August that Spears no longer wanted his father to be his sole custodian and wanted a bank to be appointed custodian of his. finances. In November, Ingham also made the bombshell revelation that the former child star is ‘afraid of his father’ and will not happen again while he remains in charge of his career. (He repeatedly declined the Times’ requests for comment.)
In response, Thoreen deflected the subject and attempted to paint a portrait of a loving father who was baffled by the allegations.
“When the pandemic started, they spent two weeks with other family members, squatted in Louisiana and spent a lot of time together,” she said. “Britney and Jamie have made long journeys together. They played and worked in the family garden. And every night, Jamie would cook southern comfort food that the family ate and enjoyed together.
“At that time, Britney never expressed those words to her father,” added Thoreen. “She never asked him to withdraw.
She also didn’t say whether she thought the crackdown on Jamie was from the singer or his lawyer.
“Jamie loves his daughter. And like any other family, problems do arise from time to time, but that doesn’t take away the love and support they have for each other. Britney knows her daddy loves her, and she knows she can call on him anytime, wardship or not, “Thoreen said, later repeating her point:” Jamie is Britney’s curator because He loves it. He wants the best for Britney.
Thoreen hasn’t really addressed the powerful #FreeBritney movement, which Jamie has once referred to as “conspiracy theorists,” who believe the singer remains in guardianship against her will and is being exploited by her father.
“I think we have to remember how this Guardianship was started and Britney needed help, and that’s why the Guardianship was put in place and why Jamie was appointed,” she says.
The “Piece of Me” singer did not appear in the documentary and did not address it directly after her debut earlier this month. However, her Instagram account, which has long been exploited for clues about her well-being, indirectly referred to the renewed interest in her case.
“Framing Britney Spears,” which explores the origins of the #FreeBritney movement, has encouraged die-hard Britney fans and casual viewers to look into Spears’ tutelage.
The documentary also sparked a toll that prompted empathetic reflections and apologies from those who believe they have wronged the singer in the past, including her ex Justin Timberlake, shock jock Howard Stern, comedians. , journalists and MTV VJ.
#FreeBritney vocal advocates pushed back Thoreen’s account on Twitter on Thursday, criticize the lawyer for his position and for going through the interview “trying to remember what his fake script said.”
A representative for Thoreen did not immediately respond to The Times’ request for comment on Thursday.
Here’s a look at what Spears fans had to say:
[ad_2]
Source link