11 MEPs have signed an appeal against some budget articles | phalanges



[ad_1]

Eleven deputies signed the appeal prepared by the Judges Club of Lebanon with some articles that affect the judges in the budget presented to the Constitutional Council.

The deputies who signed the call were: the Phalange party president, Sami Gemayel, Nadim Gemayel, Elias Hankash, Paula Yacoubian, Adi Demerjian, Fouad Makhzoumi, Jamil Al-Sayed, Jean Talouzian, Osama Saad, Adnan Traboulsi and Shamil Roukoz.

Judges Club of Lebanon: We thank the 11 members of the nation who have not hesitated to sign what corresponds to their national sense

The Judges Club of Lebanon issued a statement in which it stated: "Because history is ruthless, and because we are witnesses of truth and truth that we do not compromise, and that the rule of the constitution does not become a point of view, the rule of law is an option and constitutional and legal irregularities are followed.The principles of which we still believe that they are martyred on the altar of interests, so that the judicial power does not remain a broken stick, is attacked from all sides, be it from the chain or the budget, or the hatred or the aggression of others ".

He added: "Because the independence of the judiciary is the foundation of the construction of a just state, eleven deputies have signed the appeal, proposed by the Judges Club of Lebanon, in the finance law this year, after the amendments were made, which is essentially related to the unconstitutionality of the finance law, particularly with respect to its inclusion.The Knights of the budget, it is ie articles that can not be included in any budget, and articles that have violated the rights of the judiciary in violation of the provisions of the Constitution, thus paving the way for the highest Constitutional Council, the highest legal authority of the state, to pronounce the word clemency with the rest of the rule of law.

He added: "This call is in line with what has already been announced many times by the Lebanese Judges' Club in various positions and statements, on the reasons for the objection of the majority of judges to the project. budget, which infringed their legitimate rights in the form and on the basis of their withdrawal from work for forty-five days.Because they saw the acceptance of the officials of the judicial administration, in all its aspects, implicit in the new situation, where the justifications were followed and the rumors suggested to avoid the negative effects of the project without facing it, which weakened the position of the judiciary before the political authority, the second exploited the weakness of the first to impose his will again. "

The statement stressed that "the culture of the demolition of the judiciary, which has been applied for years to leave this power unfit, subordinate, begged, does not find enough repulsion on the personal level, therefore, the moral independence The judicial and financial aspects of the judiciary at the institutional level are commensurate with the importance and the individual moral independence of the judge resulting from it.The club reaffirms that it will spare no effort to ensure that the law on the independence of the judiciary be promulgated as soon as possible.It should be noted that it is only a free and impartial voice resulting from the exercise of the right of judges recognized internationally, D international judges ".

He concluded by stating: "We must address a word of thanks to the 11 deputies of the nation, who have not hesitated to sign according to their national sense, that the bet remains firm on the decision of the Constitutional Council, which must restore the flare of constitutional principles and dust off the interest "Justice in general is fair, it aims the course of parliamentary action and reminds the importance of a judicial system independent, pillar of the state. "

Source: Kataeb.org

[ad_2]
Source link