[ad_1]
Al-Akhdar played in his eighth league match and tied Tripoli with a late goal: to attack the Lebanese federation and present the referees in their last match, threatening to withdraw from the tournament. A statement was reportedly issued by President Nabil Badr and Secretary Abbas Hbadan without returning to other members of the administration, while the club's director, Bilal Farraj, told "News" that the administration was attached to the words of Badr. The Confederation confirmed Tuesday the result of the match.
In the statement, Ansar corrected three arbitration cases during the match against Tripoli, including without counting the goal of Senegalese Haj Malik Tal for undercover, while the result indicates the progression of two "green" goals against a goal, but the judges found that the infiltration existed and the decision Not counting the goal was true, as she saw too, that the kick of repair received by the fans and the goal tying, were not true, and this case did not respond to the statement, of course. The second case was not aimed at expelling Tripoli player Abdullah Aïch in the 84th minute of the match, while Al-Ansar was still ahead of the result, an incorrect decision of referee Jamil Ramadan and approved by the referees committee. The third case was the late start of the second half of 17 minutes due to Tripoli's objection to the first referee's decision to calculate an incorrect penalty for the guests.
Al-Ansar's remarks about the boycott of the team sparked discontent
As a result, the referee failed to lead the match, the referee left the club a chance for the fans to shoot an incorrect penalty and the host club put pressure on him. The decision to expel the player from Tripoli six minutes before the end of the match was not taken. During the match, Al-Najma and Al-Safa, but also an impressive mistake in the match between Al-Ahed and Al-Salam Zagharta.
The statement of Al-Ansar was followed by a statement by the club's president, Nabil Bader, in which he was referring to the possibility of not playing the next match against Al Ahly Ahli if Union proved the outcome of the Tripoli meeting, which took place less than 24 hours later. As for the public, he was in the ranks of the administration and the president, without paying attention to the repercussions of such decisions, which led to the resolution of points and the cancellation of the results and the second degree.
The Tripoli administration reacted to Al-Ansar's statement by presenting new arbitration cases. She said that Al-Ansar player Haj Malik Tall had "spat" on Tripoli player Abdullah Aish and that the badistant coach of the guests had attacked the player and insulted his teammate. The Tripoli declaration went to what does not mean the referees, such as dislodging some of the Ansar stadium supporters, breaking the seats and trying to join the players after the match (according to the statement).
Al-Ansar will play his next match, and if he does not, he will bear the consequences of the decision to withdraw, as did the star the previous season. It is certain that the message of the club has arrived, and that the referee who strikes and miss will calculate a thousand accounts before making his decision in the "green" games, if not ruled out the Ramadan games in power, as this was the case with referee Mohamed Darwish, who missed the leadership of Al-Ansar after the first week. From the local league.
2019, clubs still threaten to withdraw from matches and tournaments under the pretext of arbitration and the like, and the union remains lenient to make serious decisions to protect leaders, having banned any badociation or person from doing statements and authorizations affecting arbitrators and arbitration, Do not submit to threats.
The team is a scapegoat
In the penultimate paragraph of the statement of Al-Ansar, the administration indicated that it would comply with the public decision in case of withdrawal request from the league and " Consequences that result from "the fact that the players do not participate in any activity under the authority of the Union,. Thus, the team was a victim of rivalry between the administration of Ansar and the Union of the game, but the reality says the opposite. In addition to the threat, which most players deem unacceptable to boycott the team, especially at the Asian Cup, which begins in about two months, the club can not prevent its players from joining the national team. "Forcing clubs to allow their players to join the team on the international call, without recognizing any agreement between the club and the player who violated it, so the Ansar threat is not in the first place legal, and not patriotic, as most people have pointed out, and it has provoked undesirable reactions.
Union supporters fined
The Lebanese Football Federation imposed a fine of one million Lebanese pounds on the Al-Ansar club, pursuant to article 1 22 of the Penal Code, as well as damages at the Tripoli Municipal Stadium. Worth $ 960. In the same context, the union suspended the director of the team Safa Youssef Baalbaki for administrative tasks and prevented him from entering for six months in the premises badigned to the administrative and technical and main platform in accordance with Article 3_4 of the sanctions regime.
Source link
