[ad_1]
The penalty inflicted on Egyptian international Mohamed Salah in front of Newcastle during the match between Liverpool and Macbayes continues to sink a lot of ink in England.
Salah received the penalty after falling off his jersey in zone 18. It was reported that the Liverpool striker had been suspended for circumventing the referee, but the final result was the acquittal of the Egyptian player.
The Sun newspaper published an article from referee Mark Halsey comparing the incident with Salah to the fact that the FA ignored the fact that Everton had been killed last season.
The article pointed out that it was unreasonable not to punish the Egyptian player. Everton's striker had been sentenced the same season, but the FA was not accusing Salah this time.
Mark Helsey attacked Salah after the match via his personal account on the Twitter social network "See details", and now after the Englishman did not point the finger at Salah, for that he's talking again.
Hilsey said in his article that he had spoken to former footballers since the whistle of the referee at the end of Liverpool and Newcastle to tell them about Salah's incident, all of which were over. He agreed with him, and that deceiving the referee had further aggravated the matches.
The English referee confirmed that the Newcastle midfielder, Paul Dumit, had touched Salah's arm, but it was not enough to drop the player in an exaggerated form appearing in front of millions of people , which is not normal.
Mark concluded his article by saying that he was sad and worried in front of the jury of the English Union, who had not even tried to look at the case and discuss it. try to find out if Salah was wrong or not, and hoped that the VAR system would be put in place as soon as the appointment of the Premiership until the elimination of these deceptive acts, Foot.
[ad_2]
Source link
