[ad_1]
The increase in the number of data breaches during the recent period and the application of the data protection list GDPRAnd the growing mistrust of the way companies treat personal data for their customers is one of the main reasons for the growing awareness of the importance of privacy protection. data for users and businesses.
As a result, users are taking more and more steps to protect their own data, resulting in a significant increase in the number of privacy-seeking applications, such as Virtual Private Networks (VPNs).VPN), And many of these searches are done in the months of apps from my Google Play store and Appstore, where it became the acronym "VPN"The second-highest search term that does not rely on a brand, and these apps have recently generated hundreds of millions of downloads.
But the irony is that some recent security investigations conducted by the site Top10VPN Revealed how official application stores are failing to secure their users by hosting applications with security vulnerabilities, unclear privacy policies, and clandestine developers with unreliable links.
Here are five reasons why these official stores offer false security in the protection of your data:
1. Lack of interest in privacy policies
Among the top 20 free virtual private networks VPN On my Google Play store and Appstore, 86% of them had privacy rules making it difficult to protect users' personal data.
As revealed by a study conducted by the site Top10VPN 85% of the 150 months were applied VPN Free Google Play Store Bid Permissions authorizations Or the source code source code This can be quite disturbing if we are talking about games or other entertainment applications, but in the case of VPNs – where users transmit all their travels over the Internet via the servers managed by the developer – These results are a disaster for protection of privacy.
2. Sharing data with a third party
VPNs typically have standard privacy policies explaining how to protect Internet traffic data from records or controls, but some applications reviewed explicitly stated that they migrated this data to China, where many companies own these applications. Even worse, not being able to guess what many developers of virtual private network applications – which provide strategies without details – can do with browsing data pbading through their servers.
3. Non-application of stricter standards
In China, six out of ten companies are Chinese companies, reputed to monitor and censor the Internet, which has recently taken action to crack down on local VPNs that may violate the privacy of the user. That's why Apple and Google have not put in place a more rigorous set of standards on these apps to protect their users.
4. Quality badurance in the application stores is not required
After the Cambridge scandal revealed how Facebook was managing its user data, Apple launched an app removal. ONAVO Protect Facebook property – acquired by Facebook Onavo In 2013, a company that badyzes and protects – and who specializes in Internet browsing via a virtual private network VPN From his store store to not comply with its privacy rules.
As for Google, it is clear that it acts only when it is forced. For example, Google removed 85 apps from the Google Play store after discovering that it was an adware that ran full-screen ads on Android users' devices, apps are video game apps, video applications and remote sensing simulations that have touched nearly 9 million Android users around the world.
It is clear that the quality badurance in the app stores is not so powerful, as thousands of potential malicious applications are left free to attract millions of dollars. # 39; s users. Actions are then undertaken.
5 – do not specify who are the owners of the applications
Perhaps the most disturbing aspect of the study conducted by the site Top10VPN On these applications, the extent of research done by the team to know the companies responsible for the development of these applications, and the average user will not be able to conduct this research. Apple and Google will not clarify it. Here we find it timely to ask a lot of questions about These companies do what they do with user data and why they are not explicitly disclosed to users.
[ad_2]
Source link
