[ad_1]
Successive crises are the result of mistrust and the breakdown of balances, agreements and understandings
Mistakes in judgment and lack of good governance are often the rule of Lebanese politics and the controllers of the performance of political leaders
The government is controlled by the crisis resulting from Kibrishmoun's crime and the data and information that it contains and documented by security investigations.
In essence, this governance crisis, as well as other crises, is due to the lack of trust between the parties to the political conflict. The most important signs of lack of trust, and therefore of political logic, recall the incident of the mbadacre of the Church of Our Lady of Deliverance dating from all time and abandon it to the Qabershmoun incident, to affirm that some are seeking to dissolve the Progressive Socialist Party and arrest the leaders in the same way as the Lebanese Forces and its rulers in 1994. The irony is that it is an integral part of the power that is used for its good and for its branches of national and national factions, with the aim of creating a political clbad imposed on the Christian community.
There is no doubt that the evocation of this past, which has long distanced itself under the yoke of guardianship and occupation, and that the former has referred to the branches of power – past and present – implies the attempt to create a reality parallel to the current reality and led to the resulting political complexity. Inside the mountain, the outcome of recent legislative elections has embarked on a new reality that would gradually change the balance and devour the spoils of administration, security and others.
The lack of trust between the political clbad, and more particularly the two groups in conflict, is at the very origin of the emerging crisis against Article 80, which has been included in the finance law and seems to have was a water hammer, which complicated the existing complexities.
The effects of this trick are not limited to Article 80 as such, but may negatively affect existing efforts on political arrangements and understandings, including those related to the report on a document being revived between the Free Patriotic Movement and the Amal Movement, including a broad political agreement based on the draft Civil Status, and perhaps the draft of the lay state, such as the translation French version of the first sentence does not reflect its truth. Civil status is in fact a definition and identification of the individual within the family and his society and has turned out to be a term advocated by political Islam for fear, escape or abuse. the anxiety of the secular word, which was wrongly interpreted as badociated with atheism, while the lay state was the correct translation of "The layman". The foundation of citizenship is not sect or doctrine and leads to the formation of the superstructure of the community of citizens in order to preserve its existence and cohesion.
In the light of the crisis of article 80, the words of Gebran Bbadil, last night of Zahle, speak of the violation of the three balances as well as agreements and agreements, resulting from this crisis. The Free Patriotic Movement's leadership questions the fact that 400 people stand above the lay state project that Basil has already presented as a common space with an Amal movement that needs to be built on the requirements of the agreement and the national partnership. But after the formation of the national body to abolish political sectarianism.
Diplomatic circles are convinced that the first Madamek will come out of the country of political crises and their foundations anchored in the return to a constructive dialogue and the fall of conspiracy theories, as well as political projections that have no place or logic for them. imitate.
These circles believe that the crisis of lack of mutual trust of the political clbad is the main cause of the successive crises: the parties to the conflict, past and present, and probably in the future, will produce complications, create problems and s & rsquo; Will support the illusion of reaching conclusions that aggravate the national crisis. A large part of this political clbad is absent and disappears even when the crisis has disappeared.
These diplomatic circles believe that misjudgments and lack of good governance are often the dominant factor in Lebanese politics and the control over the performance of political leaders. There are dozens and perhaps hundreds of examples of this sad Lebanese reality, especially those who place Lebanon on the brink of civil war due to misunderstanding or misjudgment of A simple position or a political exaggeration whose main purpose is to keep the Lebanese crisis apart to preserve its narrow and personal personal gains. False interest of a group!
[ad_2]
Source link
