[ad_1]
According to well-informed sources, this is a work far from the bottom of the study, but the "Free Patriotic Movement" tries to conduct a pre-emptive battle for fear of agitating certain parts with a paper count with Muslim majority.
But sources believe that the Aounist attack, which came from outside the political context, was a new helplessness that would be exploited by the "present" enemies.
Sources point out that the free patriotic movement and its leader, Minister Gebran Bbadil, made their mistaken first steps after the Qabrshmoun incident, attempting to tighten the nerves of Christians in general and Chouf Christians. Aley in particular, after provoking a political conflict.
The sources added that the Christians did not want to restore scenes of war and that they felt that the policy of Bbadil had brought them to them. Therefore, the speech that initially interested him is a burden to them.
Sources say the same thing happened yesterday because the study, which would have been long, turned the Aounis themselves into a weapon against the chest, instead of the counter-attack aimed at curb any attempt to talk about the demography of Lebanon, if it already exists, In front of the enthusiasts of Basil's speech, it is again felt that this speech of Basil can actually lead to the restoration of the idea of "counting" .
The sources said the "Lebanese Forces" would be the first to take advantage of what had happened, especially that its media policy and speech clearly supported former minister Melhem Al-Riyashi in a television interview in which he was deciding on the question of successors in the Public Service Council, quite contrary to the position of the "Free Patriotic Movement". .
Source link
