[ad_1]
MP Eddie Maalouf, a member of the "fort in Lebanon" group, said that "what happened about article 80 of the 2019 finance law can be summed up as follows", noting that "during the A vote was taken on this issue, but the discussions were based on the fact that the subject was at the center of discussions between Minister Salim Grizzati and Deputy Speaker of the House of Representatives Elie Farzli and the Deputy Ibrahim Kanaan, and in light of this information, President Nabih Berri announced at this meeting. At the time of the suppression of this article and the vote on them, we did not use the members of the bloc to raise the issue. question, because we did not have to adopt it, but we were sure that Re announced the deletion. "
"The question is not ordinary, and at the meeting of the" block "held before the start of meetings in this affair," pointing out that "Foreign Minister Gibran Bbadil instructed deputies to follow him ", did he declare. "The law is not repealed except for another law, and this proposal is at the center of a" block "lesson, from Article 95 of the Constitution, which provides for the 39, equality between Christians and Muslims in institutions and public administrations.
Maalouf stressed that "the trend towards revolution but the search for the best way to collect the rights for the second time in a row", saying: "Those who are covered by Article 80 of the budget will not employees ", referring to" what was published a few days ago in "International information" "The Lebanese: 5.5 million people", which evokes the increase in "number of Lebanese between 1932-2018, 4.4 million, or 426%. And this percentage was not part of the confessions, the Christians reached 174.5% against 785.1% of Muslims ", according to what was published in the newspaper" Middle East "under the title" The Christians of Lebanon face the imbalance demographically adhering to Taif and a new study reveals Their percentage is reduced to a third and the constitution imposes parity ".
Maalouf said that "the publication of these studies at this point in time is not innocent, stressing that we adhere to the minimum as stipulated in the Constitution," noting that "what happened during the budget adoption meeting, the question arises, on the clarity of the vote of Ma and against, ":" The electronic vote has become necessary and that is what we will follow in the "block".
The article expresses the opinion of the author and not necessarily the site's policy
[ad_2]Source link