[ad_1]
Yesterday was a mixed presenter. It is reported that the firm will meet next week after a series of positive signals on how to deal with the issue of orchards, but optimism quickly "flew" after it turned out that solutions lack mutual trust. However, yesterday, the message of the President of the Republic to the House of Representatives, after signing the finance law, eclipsed the others. Especially through its reading of Article 95 of the Constitution, which states that the transitional period for the abolition of political sectarianism has not yet been reached, therefore, full equality must be adopted in accordance with the requirements of the national agreement.
Yesterday, information about the imminent resolution of the orchard crisis was mixed. The issue of returning the case to the military court having been dropped, things are coming back to zero. Former MP Walid Jumblatt leaves for Mukhtarah and waited to meet the Director General of General Security, Major General Abbas Ibrahim.
In the first possibility, the deputy Talal Arslan was supposed to agree to put the question to the vote in the Council of Ministers, while ensuring that the result is "15 ministers and 15 ministers against", the proposal to return the case before the Judicial Council falls and the case ends with the ordinary judiciary to review the case. The proponents of this proposal agreed that Arslan was prepared to accept that the case not be referred to the Judicial Council, as long as it was presented to the Council of Ministers, without obtaining the majority required, but the bet was that Jumblatt would agree with the director as he would not send the case back to the Justice Council. But Jumblatt fears that any unforeseen event of the session, such as the absence of one of his allies, forces him to refuse to reject the proposal.
After that, it was sought to convince Arslan to agree that the military court was to take up the case and that the prosecutor near that court, Peter Germannos, stated that he was not going to take the case. was not competent to rule on this case and entrust the case to the discriminatory prosecutor, who in turn referred him to the Minister of Justice. It was learned that the meeting between President Michel Aoun and Arslan and Minister Saleh al-Gharib, in the presence of Ministers Elias Abu Saab, Salim Gritasati and the Director General of General Security Abbas Ibrahim, had convinced Arslan of this solution, but things stopped when it turned out that such a measure would restore things In the beginning, in order for the dispute to be resumed after the referral of the case to the Council of Justice, it was added that President Saad Hariri will be in the foreground this time, through the discriminatory prosecutor, who will be forced to determine the destination of the case.
However, although the solution was not seen yesterday, the deminers are dealing with what was accomplished yesterday and that could lead to a breakthrough that will end soon with the call for the convening of the Council of ministers before Eid al-Adha. He was quoted by President Nabih Berri as surprised by the "non convening of the Council of Ministers, despite the positive effects of the international and financial community, which seems favorable to Lebanon, especially after the adoption of the budget and signed by the president of the Republic". With regard to initiatives to solve the problem of government, he stressed that "there are many initiatives, but all initiatives are governed by the consensus of the parties concerned. If this agreement is not concluded between the parties, it is natural that all the initiatives fall ".
Letter to the House of Representatives
On the other hand, after the controversy around article 80 of the budget and its rejection by the Minister Gebran Bbadil, the President of the Republic signed the finance law, suspended in this article, which preserves "the right of success to matches and examinations organized by the Public Service Council on the decision of the Council of Ministers ". Duly appointed by the relevant departments. "Significantly, the entry of the Presidency of the Republic on the line" the confusion that occurred when adopting the article mentioned "in the House of Representatives, entailing the implicit responsibility of those who contributed to the adoption of the article, which contains a flaw in the Charter, and stated that "the meeting of the House of Representatives which had discussed it a great deal had resulted in creating solutions – or was innovating – to avoid this imbalance, before the intervention of the legislator mentioned ".
Berri: sectarian resistance does not use sectarianism
Aoun said that the results of the matches were contrary to the "requirements of the national agreement" that must be taken into account in the case of abolishing the rule of sectarian representation and the adoption of the competence and efficiency of the public service. In his letter to the Council, he asked the Council to interpret the phrase "requirements of national conciliation" contained in Article 95 of the Constitution, with reference to paragraph j of its introduction, particularly in light of its implications for the public service.
Contrary to the interpretation of Article 95, which limits the equality of functions of the first category or its equivalent, the reading of the article by the Presidency takes into account the fact that the text is contingent on the establishment of a step-by-step plan leading to the abolition of sectarianism, National Reconciliation ", with the exception of jobs in the first category or their equivalents, where they are also The President of the Republic is therefore questioning the beginning of this transitional phase, given the absence of any procedure for the establishment of the "interim plan" or the constitution of the National Commission for the Abolition of Sectarianism, which means "the principle that this transition has not yet begun".
Berri, who did not receive the message at Wednesday's meeting, said that "the parliament will remain the bulwark against any division." Everything in this country can only be tolerated by undermining its unity and unity. Unity of his people ". He said, according to MEPs, "the resistance to sectarianism and sectarianism is not based on sectarianism and sectarianism, but on the recourse to tolerance and dialogue and to mutual and mutual understanding".
The article expresses the opinion of the author and not necessarily the site's policy
[ad_2]Source link
