Zaven returns to the dialogue of prestige: the content is always a king!



[ad_1]

In the media, Zaven has given the televised debate its prestige, which we have forgotten in the midst of the torrent of "resurfacing" programs of politics and entertainment and the fall of television programs in the race for unscientific competition with networks.

Zaven's dialogue with one of the most important references to scientific research in the field of mental health in Lebanon did not require either an independent hahtag, nor interaction with the Lebanese and Lebanese public, nor the present in addition to the media traditional.

In fact, the stories supporting the episode were profound, though spontaneous and simple to implement, in order to restore this approach to the ease of abstinence, while the chains of television compete for visual glare without content.

Force the contents of the loop itself. We are facing a scientific stature that deals with the Lebanese reality without dramatic doses or negative stereotypes, what we have been seeing on our screens for years of frustration and failure one after the other.

Thus, Professor Karam solved a light and heavy guest of content to talk about the phenomenon of post-war Lebanese psychological society.

Zafin has managed to penetrate a significant part of his guest's personal space. Psychologists know that it's hard to touch the personal aspects of scientists because their criteria are simply different from popular criteria and are subject to self-censorship, and they prefer to avoid any personal matter in public.

Karam was not completely autonomous, he spoke as an experienced expert who encouraged the viewer to explore the reasons for his success and his interaction with the chains of birth, death and war. It was their opponents.

It can be said that the episode reached its peak when Zaven, who seemed very effective in his research in psychiatry, inquired about the reasons for the "purity" of Lebanese and scientific data describing their psychological traits. Professor Karam's answer is firm and indisputable. This man spent decades studying Lebanese society and was the first to place Lebanon on the map of psychiatry around the world. He is currently leading a study on the impact of the war on genes (also in Syria).

In the content as well, he inscribes in his questions his connection with the traditional conflict between science and religion in his questions. The Lebanese character shares Lebanese identities with a quick change, allowing them to celebrate and celebrate in parallel with crises of fear and anxiety.

It is true that a series of "influencers" have re-established the prestige of the televised debate and Zaven has imposed itself with the power of content, whether in the choice of his guests or in the treatment of subjects, despite the difficult situation of television "Future".

Are other journalists eager to follow the success of "without a long biography" or is the "public will that" theory the answer to the fact that many media professionals do not have a culture of dialogue?

[ad_2]
Source link