[ad_1]
With the first month of crisis caused by the suspension of cabinet meetings "forced" to avoid a split that threatens the government because of the aftermath of the orchard accident and the beginning of the second month of the crisis, the political parties and their partners began to impose impossible conditions for the resumption of hearings, serious about the overall internal situation. The insistence of most parties in the March 8 coalition, with the exception of the Amal movement, to include the repercussions of the orchard incident in the reality of government, is to insist that this incident is referred to the Judicial Council. After nearly failing the advanced efforts pursued by the Director General of General Security, Major General Abbas Ibrahim suggested a breakthrough in the wall of the crisis, especially after the meeting held at the Baabda Palace under the presidency of President Michel Aoun and in the presence of MP Talal Arslan. Laila Bou Saab, Salim Grisati and General Ibrahim, but these efforts soon came up against the same harshness as was expressed by insisting that the sinister Bashamoun be submitted to the Council of Justice and voted in council ministers.
According to sources involved in the current political movement, efforts to resolve the return to zero point, while others confirmed that contacts were continuing, but that a new proposal after the vote fell before the Council of Justice in the Council of Ministers. Therefore, a cabinet meeting will not be held this week. The following week's session is held before Eid al-Adha, linked to the success of the new director based on reconciliation.
The sources confirmed that it was not true that the leader of the Progressive Socialist Party, Walid Jumblatt, was the only one who refused to discuss the vote of the Judicial Council in the Council of Ministers, but the president Nabih Berri was also briefed by General Abbas Ibrahim that the enthusiasm aroused by the option Leading to the destruction of the country, and rejected mainly by Prime Minister Saad Hariri, convinced that the vote would be a divisional division the whole country and not just the government of national reconciliation.
Informed sources pointed out that the negotiations on the last proposal had been interrupted by a vote of the Judicial Council, preventing its continuation in the military court, while the Progressive Socialist Party had observations and objections and evoked interference. ministers and political parties in court cases. From one judge to another, without giving up on the desired Democratic party.
We know that contacts are continuing and that the new reconciliation called Really to completely defuse the problem before the entry of all ministers in the Council of Ministers. It may take some time before work on reconciliation is resolved.
"Judicial" confrontation!
However, serious events in the last few hours represent information about the interventions that led to the political factor's involvement in the judicial process after the parties were desperate to return the case to the Justice Council after their attempts. In the light of Jammblatt's rejection of this request and the solidarity of Berri and Hariri, circles close to the Progressive Socialist Party of An-Nahar revealed that the alternative plan had emerged with the fabrication of suspicious and illegal things and made pressure on Judge Claude Ghanem to claim a complaint unrelated to the investigations carried out by the Division of Public Information. Internal security forces. Although the judge requested information from other agencies, including the Army Intelligence Branch, no new information was available and was consistent with the investigations of the Division of Public Information. These circles stated that the allegation was a political claim under the pressure of a ministerial team. "We want a judge who is obedient," she said. She also mentioned a scandal in the transfer of the file, because Judge Basil is a lawyer. "The battle was moved with all its flagrant intervention before the military court."
The position of Aoun
In the meantime, the speech delivered by the President of the Republic on the occasion of the celebration of the tradition of 269 officers graduating from the Military Academy on the occasion of the Day of the Army will leave them with political satisfaction , especially with regard to the remarkable emphasis on the commitment of the Taif Accord and its call for the abandonment of the language of the past. In this regard, President Aoun said: "At this stage, Lebanon derives no benefit from evoking the language and practices of the past, from balancing sensitivities and from the heart of the common will and demands of coexistence. Any such practice, whether political or administrative, is detrimental to national life, threatens to slow down growth and emerge from the current crisis, and must stop immediately.The Taef Agreement, which was implemented in the oath speech and the commitment made by the government in its ministerial declaration, provides a framework for the protection of the National Charter by protecting the rights of all and ensuring a balance between the different segments of society and its components, so there can be no practice or position contrary to his spirit. "
The most important reception was the position of Prime Minister Fouad Siniora, President Aoun, who declared that "the speech delivered by the President of the Republic on the occasion of the army is very important and precise. The President is the protector of the Constitution and the person responsible for its application. All Lebanese, because we must emphasize the need to continue in this direction, which serves the national consensus on the Constitution and supports stability and coexistence.
In his speech, the President stated that Lebanon does not benefit at this stage to recall the language of the past and its practices as an instrument of sensitivity and at the heart of the will of coexistence and the established requirements. The words of the President deserve praise and praise, and he pays to stand by his side to ensure that all ministers and other officials are united and committed to the declaration. because the lesson to be learned is that the execution and practice will be identical to those of the president. "
[ad_2]
Source link
