[ad_1]
Nisreen Balout wrote in the "Republic":
The literary insult between the authors of the art of imprisonment is characterized by the advent of the first author of the double literary dichlorique, treats the work of the second author for personal reasons, writes about him with excessive enthusiasm, then aggravates the critics to dissipate his work in an excessive way, the critics seem very sharp. .
What I mean here is the first hate of the second, not the quality of work or skills. Here too, the words of the poet Mutanabi can be applied in his famous poetic house: "All animations can be desired by her / Adak's only enmity by envy."
Battles of writers
Jarir and Al-Farzadeq both praised himself and his hair, deliberately insulting each other and hurting him.
Battles took place between Voltaire and Rousseau. These are striking phenomena in the light of French philosophy in the eighteenth century. Both resisted religious commitment and intolerance. Rousseau was a fan of Voltaire's work, but he did not express any compliment or admiration for Rousseau's work. But one day says: "I do not like La Rousseau or his writings". When Rousseau released his new "Holliouz", Voltaire strongly attacked him, calling him "bourgeois" and "stupid". With regard to the "social contract", it is scandalous to have stated that "only a little philosopher who frequents small houses is fit".
Victor Hugo's enmity with his opponent, Saint-Bove, was a long friendship because he had tried to get closer to his wife, which prompted Bove to declare the final disagreement and responded to his affront: "Myself, despair and indignation, overwhelming desire to kill you, we are now enemies … enemies to death …", and the pillars of friendship that united the two were torn and immersed in the mold of the human moral anathema.
Tolstoy waged a fierce war against Shakespeare, saying that he did not deserve the high position he held in the world of literature, so his title is a petty writer. "My long-standing vision of Shakespeare's work is directly opposed to the opinion of the entire European world," he said. I felt a strong belief that the indisputable glory of Shakespeare's great genius, which makes our book of times mimic it, readers and viewers find virtues that do not exist – thus distorting their aesthetic and moral understanding – a great evil as in every lie.
In addition, the enmity between Gabriel García Marquez and Peruvian Mario Vargas Llosa surprised them because of their strong friendship. Both were blinking in the light. Marquis surprises the realm of literature with his "Hundred Years of Unity", while Yossa is stunned by his first novel, The City and Dogs, in 1963. The controversy would likely have erupted after Brands' relationship with the woman of Yosa, who had separated from her husband for a long time. By Order Despite the fact that the human detachment went further after Yossa beat Markis in the eye, causing political dysfunction, Marquez supports the Fidel Castro regime against Lusa, which favors liberal regimes, creating a charged atmosphere that led to a hostile relationship between the two.
The antagonism between the dean of literature Taha Hussein and the great writer Abbas Mahmoud Akkad, the reasons for Akkad's critique to the forgiveness message written by Taha Hussein on the philosophy of Abu Al-Ala Maari. Where he wrote: "The message of forgiveness is a unique model in our Arabic literature, and the style of a dialect and a curious format of criticism and novel, and the idea of an insect we do not know, nobody preceded is a brief appreciation of the message of forgiveness.
Taha Hussein replied: "Does Akkad know that Dante has become a poet of eternal glory over the centuries and generations, and he is confident that everyone is impressed by something similar under this message of forgiveness?"
After publishing his first poem in the journal Sha & # 39; ar, Nazik al-Malikat very harshly criticized al-Maghout, in his book titled "Issues of Contemporary Poetry", in which he writes that what he writes is not poetry.
The enmity of Youssef Idris with Naguib Mahfouz is a return to the Nobel Prize, who became the first Arab writer to reap. Idris publicly stated that he was the right candidate and the first candidate, but addressed Najib for his position in favor of normalization with Israel, serving him for political rather than literary reasons.
Human literary scandals remain subject to personal psychological factors, the referee can not use them, and can be considered as a critical folk art because of the control of their personal situation and their particular attitudes, but lacking basic knowledge. technical or objective reasons.
[ad_2]
Source link
