[ad_1]
Raquel Ateeq wrote in Al-Gomhuria:
In his political speech, no politician in Lebanon was as controversial as Gibran Bbadil, president of the Free Patriotic Movement. A speech, a press conference or a press conference can not pbad to Basil as a "quiet soul" Unlike most Lebanese politicians, it does not embarrbad the ambiguity in his speech, neither retouch his words for fear of humiliating others in a country governed by historical, political, religious and sectarian sensitivities. He does not recognize Tabu, taking into account what he really considers, in a simple, clear and direct way that communicates his messages to the public and politicians. A speech that provoked many, especially other religious denominations, but also took the lead, contributing, among other factors, to form the largest Christian parliamentary bloc and obtain the largest ministerial part.
Why does Basil not change his speech? Why not take a flexible and unprovoked approach? Why do not stop attacking others? Some believe, however, that after the Qabrishmoun incident and the ensuing crisis and disruption, Bbadil will adopt a less provocative, less provocative speech, especially since one of the Bbadil's speech during his tours in the Lebanese regions has not escaped political and popular reactions, whether they are positive or negative. From Bcharre to Tripoli, the Bekaa and the mountain.
However, although Basil's speeches are improvised, they are not random: man masters the art and tools of political discourse. He knows perfectly the impact of speech in form, performance, language, content and timing on the public and the creation of public opinion. His vision of profit and loss differs from that of other politicians. As a result, the bet to change rhetoric fell and the proof of his last speech when laying the foundation stone of the current siege on August 7th.
Bbadil's peculiarities include content, form, performance and method, and whatever ideas are shared with others, he decides on the form and content of his speech. The leader of the "current" prepares each formulation of his speeches. The official speeches he pronounces as Foreign Minister are written, in contrast to his speeches at the head of the current and parliamentary bloc of "Strong Lebanon".
Bbadil identifies the political issues he wants to address and communicates messages, whether political or public, and knows exactly what he is focusing on in his speech. The political events also impose in his speech, also he speaks sometimes after a meeting of the block "Strong Lebanon". He personally deduced that the importance of the event when he speaks is the goal of communicating a specific message, and accurately convey the situation, in his own style and his own language.
As for the consultation or polls of opinion of Bbadil, it depends on the quality of his speech, he is a multi-directional character and, as Minister of Foreign Affairs who manages his political and diplomatic team within the ministry, this ministry is an official work of the Lebanese State. At the general political level, he consults a number of people as leader of the parliamentary bloc and Parliament. His adviser Antoine Constantine is one of the most important participants in the process of "reflection" and presents the political message that Basil wants to express in his speech, while highlighting the points and ideas to be addressed in his speeches and press conferences. After a brainstorming with his team.
Regarding the preparation of speeches or speeches that will be uttered on any occasion, no one writes at the head of the current, which is obvious because he develops his ideas and in the vernacular without reading or reciting a written word in Mandarin, whether on a paper in front of him or on the screen. Not Visible This is something that distinguishes Basil from many leaders and leaders who read what they write or talk about what they have memorized, not their own ideas, as evidenced by their stuttering, inconsistency and spontaneity. during the "recitation".
Regarding his visits, Bbadil is informed before any visit of the data of the region that he will visit and does not go before the formation of a global vision. He stores ideas in his head, improves his speech during the visit and does not write it. It also consults with all persons involved in the visit, as well as the bloc's deputies and current regional leaders, and provides data on the situation of municipalities as well as the problems and situation of the population. It describes the MPs and stakeholders in the region in a meaningful way and the topics it wants to address.
Those who participate in brainstorming sessions with Basil say that they are real and not formal, because there is a debate and objections to the ideas advanced and convinced of the other. The essence of the idea is expressed in its own way. It also determines in advance which messages it wishes to send and how it wishes to send them. He considers his speech as an engineer, arranges ideas in his head and installs them as he builds a building, using only some of the points that he writes on paper. During his press conference, for example, after the withdrawal of the bloc "Lebanon fort" on the agricultural file, Bbadil prepared a document containing only points such as: Order and land Maronites, Article 80 …
As for the reactions to his speech and his positions, the leader does not ignore them, but listens well, but they do not take him out of his convictions, he never justifies himself. He does not accept, does not back down and does not agree to change the way he communicates his political positions and messages, no matter how harsh the negative reactions and the need to change his speech. His relatives say that he has the courage to apologize if he makes a mistake, but never justifies his position when he is criticized and objected because he is convinced that He says, whatever the results. This is why he has repeatedly stated that his speech entails high political costs.
Basile's relatives admit that he is a controversial figure and that his speech is also controversial because his positions are clear and decisive, and unambiguous. They emphasize that his style expresses his conviction and thought, and that there is a congruence between what he thinks and what he expresses, contrary to the belief of people that he does an error or seems to have a sharp expression, while it's not what he meant in the content. Instead, he chooses words that fully reflect what he has in mind and does not wear gloves when he wants to address an issue, especially those he considers existential and existential.
On the other hand, some think that Basil can convey the messages he wants, but in a flexible and unpromising language and style, as well as in a content that does not cause sensitivities, especially as in the most of his speeches, he recalls the past and the war period. "The dictation" of the current presidential style is not acceptable, she expresses her opinion, and he decides whether or not he wants to take the opinion of some people, and respects the opinion of those who say in good faith: "O Minister, express it nicely". But in the case of President Michel Aoun, Minister of Foreign Affairs and responsible for the exceptional FPM bloc in Lebanese politics, the style remains that of the French writer. George de Beavon.
[ad_2]
Source link
