[ad_1]
<div id = "firstBodyDiv" data-bind-html-content-type = "article" data-bind-html-compile = "article.body" data-first-article-body = "
But the poll also confirmed that they were refusing to pave the way for change DNA Thus, babies are born nicer, faster or longer.
One month after the introduction of birth allegations of the first child Genetic modification In China, the Associated Press poll, in collaboration with the Newark Center for Public Affairs, concluded that people are divided between the promise of technology powerful enough to change genetics and man, and concerns about its ethical use or not.
Garon Kenner, 31, designer of the opposition to the Carnegie Museum of Natural History in Pittsburgh, said it was "that the rich become capable of creating children with some determination".
But like most Americans, Keiner will support gene modification in embryos to prevent Infectious diseases, Where her mother suffers from lupus, a skin disease that can have environmental and genetic stimuli.
In this context, Kenner said "Lupus was present" in all my life. I was close to someone with a chronic illness and I saw many people with the disease, not only for my mother, but for my entire family. "
Gene editing is similar to the biological shearing and bonding program, allowing scientists to take some of the DNA to remove, replace, or repair the gene. Changing the adult cells will only affect the treated patient.
But according to international scientific principles, the modification of genes in oocytes, spermatozoa or embryos will modify the resulting offspring so that it can be pbaded on to future generations. International scientific principles state that they should not be tested in human pregnancies until extensive laboratory research is conducted. .
">
But the survey also confirmed that they were refusing to pave the way for DNA change to generate more beautiful children, faster or longer.
A month after the birth of the world's first child of genetic modification was published in China, the Associated Press poll, in collaboration with the Newark Center for Public Affairs, revealed that people were torn between the promise of A technology powerful enough to change genetics and the human being and will be used ethically or not.
Garon Kenner, 31, an exhibit designer at the Carnegie Museum of Natural History in Pittsburgh, said he was opposed to "the rich being able to create children with some determination."
But like most Americans, Kenner will support gene modification in embryos to prevent incurable diseases, where his mother suffers from lupus, a skin disease that can have environmental and genetic stimuli.
"Lupus has been there all my life," said Kenner. I was close to someone who was suffering from a chronic illness and I met many people who had it, not only for my mother, but for my whole family. "
Gene editing is similar to the biological shearing and bonding program, allowing scientists to take some of the DNA to remove, replace, or repair the gene. Changing the adult cells will only affect the treated patient.
But according to international scientific principles, the modification of genes in oocytes, spermatozoa or embryos will modify the resulting offspring so that it can be pbaded on to future generations. International scientific principles state that they should not be tested in human pregnancies until extensive laboratory research is conducted. .
