Abdullah: We can withdraw from the government if necessary

A member of the deputy "Democratic Rally" Bilal Abdullah That "the demand PJustice Council disabled cabinetAnd if the need to disable the Cabinet and stop the wheel of reforms and the wheel of the state, let these keep their demands, "noting that" it is necessary to vote in the Council of Ministers to reduce the role of the President "Progressive Socialist Party"Former Member Walid Jumblatt, Let us know that we can withdraw from the government, and if we want to continue with the national agreement government to overcome this difficult step, let us know too"He said.

In a television interview, Abdullah pointed out that "if they insist on returning to the count between March 8 and March 14, let us know as well, and we think there is a chance that this country and alliance achieve results ".

He stressed that what is needed is that the judiciary be mentioned in the Kibrishmoun incident record, but if it is necessary to undermine the role of Jumblatt, Let's point it out, "adding," If they leave the military court, they apparently do their job, and apparently, there are interventions, It is possible to reach the final results.

In an interview with the newspaper "Major General" He stated that the subject of the dispute did not concern Article 95 of the Constitution, but the overall behavior of the Covenant and its team, which originated from the general context of the execution going beyond the powers conferred on Taif by the Prime Minister and the Council of Ministers. The failure of the implementation of Article 95 to establish sectarianism in all functional categories is a false judgment and a reflection of the illusions and dreams of the return of time before the agreement and the Constitution of Taif. Some have tried to apply Taif's agreement in a wrong way and have brought us to what we are.

"There is a constitutional mechanism to change the constitution and not the way this party is adopting." The constitution amendment requires an objective circumstance. "Is the objective circumstance now available to modify or interpret the articles of the constitution? " ?