Berri announced the removal of Article 80 in the budget and what happened to Wrap and then

MP Eddie Maalouf, a member of the "fort in Lebanon" group, said that "what happened about article 80 of the 2019 budget law is as follows", noting that A vote on this point, but discussions based on the fact that the subject was the focus of discussions between the Minister Salim Grizzati and the Deputy Speaker of the House of Representatives Elie Farzli and MP Ibrahim Kanaan, announced President Nabih Berri at this meeting. On the deletion of this article, and there was no vote on them, so, the members of the bloc did not have to raise the issue, because we were not in the process to pbad it on, but we were sure that Rey deleted declared ".

"The question is not ordinary and, at the meeting of the" bloc "that was held before the start of meetings in this case," pointing out that "Foreign Minister Gibran Bbadil, MPs to follow him, "he said. "The law is not repealed except for another law, and this proposal is at the center of a" block "lesson, from Article 95 of the Constitution, which provides for the 39, equality between Christians and Muslims in institutions and public administrations.

Maalouf stressed that "the trend towards revolution but the search for the best way to collect the rights for the second time in a row", saying: "Those who are covered by Article 80 of the budget will not employees ", referring to" what was published a few days ago in "International information" "The Lebanese: 5.5 million people", which evokes the increase in "number of Lebanese between 1932-2018, 4.4 million, or 426%. And this percentage was not part of the confessions, the Christians reached 174.5% against 785.1% of Muslims ", according to what was published in the newspaper" Middle East "under the title" The Christians of Lebanon face the imbalance demographically adhering to Taif and a new study reveals Their percentage is reduced to a third and the constitution imposes parity ".

Maalouf said that "the publication of these studies at this point in time is not innocent, stressing that we adhere to the minimum as stipulated in the Constitution," noting that "what happened during the budget adoption meeting, the question arises, on the clarity of the vote of Ma and against, ":" The electronic vote has become necessary and that is what we will follow in the "block".