[ad_1]
Well, let's compare two incidents, the first was the explosion of the Chernobyl nuclear reactor in April 1986 and the second was a nuclear explosion that occurred just a few days ago at the Akinsk Armory. in the northwest of the country, during a test of new Russian missile, but without complication. This comparison of the severity of the event or its impact on people medically, but compared the two events to the presence of the Internet and social media, the first occurred at a time when you could not to receive information about it at home, and the second that occurred at the height of our communication development, is there a clear difference?
At first glance, it starts with a short answer, yes, you do not see it? The news is ubiquitous, everything was obscured in the 80s, but now it is being broadcast on social media and everyone is talking about the crisis. Do you know that the red twilight that happened a few days ago is directly related to this incident? Some media personalities say that this explosion is a danger for us, and some advise us to start looking for bunkers. They told you that the Russians had distributed hundreds of thousands of iodine pills to citizens of neighboring cities do they fear thyroid cancer?
No, in fact, it was not distributed(1) The Russians have iodine tablets on the nearby town of the explosion, which has 185,000 inhabitants, but what has really happened, is that the news of the town is over. explosion spread and that the inhabitants of the city saw and heard his voice, terrified in their hearts, and they began to collect iodine pills in pharmacies and to serve as a fear that the explosion will happen. Nuclear radiation can harm their health and that of their children, but to say that the impact of this radiation explosion can affect many countries requires a break.
When we talk about the effect of radiation on living matter, your body, the tree and the cat from the next house, we should start by recognizing(2) Sievert, a unit equivalent to the radiation that the body can absorb, is also known as Rolf Seifert, a Swedish scientist who is both a physicist and a doctor. This device is mainly used to clarify the danger or radiation safety standards, in order to understand that he can eat a banana But what's a banana has to do with the radiation of a nuclear explosion?
In fact, many call it "equivalent dose of banana"(3) (Equivalent banana dose) The amount of ionizing radiation emitted by an average banana, estimated at 0.1 μS, where iodine naturally contains radioactive potbadium 40, this dose is used for educational purposes only, this does not mean not that radiation will accumulate in your body if you eat a lot Bananas constantly, the goal is to inform people that the body's exposure to radiation can be safe, it is present n 39; anywhere, but the problem always lies in the radiation dose.
In fact, many people do not know that humans are naturally exposed to cosmic radiation coming from space at 2,400 km / year, but if you decide to have a CT scan, you will get 7,000 km of radiation, in addition to smokers, because of the levels of plutonium in cigarettes, are exposed to a dose of 160 thousand micro Sievert per year on average, while the International Commission on Radiological Protection the highest safety limit for workers in the field of 39; Nuclear energy puts up to 20-500000 micro Sievert per year, depending on the irradiated area of the body, while the maximum disaster The nuclear, that is million million Ru Zephyrt each year.
It also discusses the extent to which the effects of severe radiation damage can begin. For example, a person may die when exposed to a short period of 4 to 5 zephyrates (equal to one million micro-zephyrates). In fact, the serious risk, namely the symptoms of nausea, loss of appetite, flaking of the skin and the impact of bone marrow and lymph nodes, For a radiation dose of 1 zephyrate (when the Chernobyl reactor burst, it reached 300 SiV per hour in the same reaction !!), it is of course many complex factors, such as the exposure method, the exposure period, the type of radioactive element and whether the person inhaled the radioactive material or exposed it through the skin. Or eat it, etc., but those – in general and for rounded purposes – are the safety limits.
But what about the recent explosion of Russia, what was its influence? Here one can meditate the Russian novel(4) Who says that the radiation of this explosion was equivalent to only 2 microns of Zephyrt, examine it again and compare it with what we have just introduced, it is a very small number and, even if it is already higher than normal rates, may induce the Russian authorities to take routine preventive measures, it can not be a source of risk, especially as the increase in radiation levels does not lasts only for about an hour.
At this point, you might wonder how accurate these numbers are. The Soviet Union has a long history of black-out and falsification of facts, contributed to the spread of this idea and all the dramatization that resulted, the last series "Chernobyl", which became global and became the highest An badessment on platforms such as IMDB, the series talks about the political cause of the Chernobyl disaster in the 1980s, a power outage to the benefit of the ruling party.
However, although we can not determine the amount of radiation resulting from this explosion, we can look at radiation measurements in neighboring countries, knowing that radiation is spreading in the atmosphere with the movement of the wind. From here we find that neighboring countries such as Finland and Norway have not registered(5) Any significant increase in the value of radiation, which means that the amount of radiation from the explosion itself was insignificant, suggesting that the explosion itself, according to the terms of the Russian novel, actually had a nuclear character but was not fissile in the sense, otherwise the effects of radiation would have been observed in Sporadic places of the world.
For more details on the medical implications of nuclear leaks and their exaggeration, you can think of a more detailed report from the author titled(6) "Chernobyl … Can a nuclear leak kill an entire continent?" But ultimately, the problem still lies in the perception that people have of the nature of nuclear radiation: once someone talks about everything that ends with words like "nuclear" and "radiation" , the vast majority of us imagine things like "a person with three feet" or "a fish with three eyes". Or fetal abnormalities, etc.
The story of this misunderstanding is rooted in the bombs of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, one of the most commonly accepted rumors when we were children before the Internet, here in the Arab world, that the Japanese This has to see with the explosion of a nuclear bomb, especially their narrow eyes, because of radiation.
In the common culture, the word "nuclear radiation" is synonymous with the greatest types of risk in the minds of people, although man is making remarkable progress in the use of nuclear radiation at the same time. medical purposes, whether for medical examinations, x-rays to computed tomography Treat diseases such as cancer, but the problem we face is of a psychological order.
In fact, this situation is already taking on a distinctive name:(7) (Radiophobia), that is to say the fear of any source of nuclear radiation, even the Japanese health effects specialist, the Japanese doctor Yoshimi Yamashita, once said that the average age of the evacuees after Chernobyl accident had fallen from 65 to 58 years, mainly because of radiation But because of depression, alcoholism and suicide.
On social networks, some have taken advantage of the fear that has prevailed since the bombs of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and have already started writing very strange events as a result of the explosion of weapons stores Akinsk.There may be degrees of gravity in the vicinity and such explosions do not only concern the nuclear problem. But also the nature of the weapon that exploded and what it was carrying on board, but that it was to ask one of the people to rush to look for caches – here in the Arab region – in order to prepare for the next catastrophic events, or the other public to prepare for cancer cases And a great climate change!
The problem we are facing at the moment is that these publications have found tremendous public outreach, so you can question the role of the Internet in our lives, inviting you to make the same comparison as the one mentioned at the beginning of the report. Or that the spread of false news about almost everything has neutralized people has become a mistrust of something and that information is lost in both cases, sometimes because it does not. is not available and sometimes because it's lost in a sea of lies ?!
The Internet and its impressive features such as superior communication and almost unlimited access to information are the gift of modern man.You can now get acquainted with physics, biology, psychology, guitar and cinematography in the best universities, while staying at home and in touch with people from all over the world, you can run the entire vast universe through your desktop.
When we share the quotations of Legasov in Chernobyl – commenting on this last incident – he says that if we hear enough lies, we can not discern the truth, or else he says that "every lie we say carries a debt to the truth, the debt will be repaid sooner or later. " The paradox is that it is us who falsify the facts: it is when we contribute to spread lies through "participation" without ensuring that, even for a certain time, the validity of our publications is respected. Here, repaying the debt is losing the contemporary gift, the effect will be disastrous.
Source link
