Did Stanley Kubrick take the film landing on the moon? – Illuminations

On July 16, 1969 at 1:30 pm GMT, director Stanley Kubrick sits in his chair. Clarke »The events are agreed.

The three heroes: Baz Aldern, Neil Armstrong and Michael Collins head for the rocket launch pad to board the Apollo 11 space shuttle, which will take them to the surface of the moon.

Three, two, one, Stanley shouts: "Action".

The camera begins to spin and the Saturn 5 rocket ignites and begins its journey in space.

After 4 days ..

Scene 2: When night falls, the lunar vehicle descends to the surface and Neil Armstrong becomes the first human to walk on the moon. His famous words say, "It's a small step for the man, but a giant step for humanity!", Followed by Buzz Aldern, Take photos, and then leave it on the ground.

After 4 more days ..

Scene 3: One day outside, in the Pacific, the probe lands in the middle of the ocean, captured by the Hornet, the three heroes return to Earth, announcing the American victory in the race to the # 39; space.

Stanley yells at the end: Well done, it's a wonderful job, guys.

If you think about it a bit, this scenario may seem like one of the Hollywood movie scripts. But can you think of a studio with a budget of $ 175 billion at today's prices?

The biggest movie budget in history

What would it take to restore the moon on Earth in Hollywood studios, then create a real spacecraft, place astronauts and describe the end – to – end landing process?

Assuming that NASA is preparing the film well before the 1969 landing day, it is expected that it will be using the equipment and techniques available in the early 1960s because she should devote more time and money to acquiring the techniques necessary to capture the landing process. So, look much more than the transition process and already travel to the moon.

The Apollo program cost the Moon a total of $ 25 billion since the early 1960s until the end of the project in the mid-1970s of the last century, or $ 175 billion at current prices, after calculating inflation rates.

Assuming all these funds have already been used to produce the biggest film, how was it spent? Take for example the salaries of the heroes of this work.

At the time, NASA had about 411,000 employees, according to Dr. David Graemes of Oxford University, according to which this secret could be hidden for three years and eight months before we speak and tell the truth.

So how can we ensure that 411,000 employees hide the secret of a false mission to land on the moon for more than three years?

They may be corrupted to buy their silence for a while, but given the average salary of NASA employees, it now rises to $ 63,000 a year. If we divide the total budget of the project at current prices, based on the number of NASA employees in the 1960s, about $ 425,000, the equivalent of the seven-year salary at the beginning of the year. actual hour.

Of course, this bribe must last until the death of all NASA employees, who will have to accept much less, given the cost of equipment and production needed to carry out the project. a movie of this size.

You may have noticed that the shadows on the photographs appear parallel to the Moon, without dispersion. Experts claim that these shadows accurately reflect the position of the sun at a distance of about 150 million kilometers.

To create such a solar effect in a studio on Earth, Stanley Kubrick would need to illuminate the scene with millions of ultra-brilliant lasers, very expensive in 1969, and the only available color was red. Now, we can change color using computer-generated graphics, but it's impossible to edit photos with a computer.

In 2009, the orbital satellite orbiter sent high resolution images of each Apollo landing site on the moon. The tire tracks of the vehicles used by the astronauts appear on the roof, with the marks of their shoes. To falsify such effects, NASA had to send something to the moon, like mechanical vehicles on Mars, to leave these effects behind.

The vehicle will cost about $ 224 million, and an additional $ 583 million will be added to the moon's orbital explorer to capture the images.

In the end, the cost of mounting the landing on the moon is much higher than the cost of landing.

Science came out of "Odessa Space"

Some people believe that NASA's plot to falsify the landing on the moon is fomented by some people, and even their belief in conspiracy theories in general.

But the dilemma lies in the fact that most of those who believe in such theories have no real scientific background and have done little research in the fields of science, space and science. astronomy, like landing on the moon, or even how Hollywood influences work or how to finance. The amount NASA spends on these projects or any related topic can improve its vision.

The evidence of the landing of Apollo 11 on the Moon has been documented by other parties, distant from NASA or from the entire United States, such as the l '. Bochum observatory in Germany, the Jodrell bank observatory in the UK and many other observatories.

Stanley Kubrick made his brilliant film "2001: Odessa Space" in 1968, with all his mastery, dazzling effects, scientific precision, anticipation of the future and unprecedented spatial photography, for a very simple reason. He used a team of astronomers, and space engineers helped him design the spaceship appeared in his film, select the effects of space lighting and even design the astronauts' costumes in the film.

Stanley Kubrick did not help NASA and directed the film landing on the moon, but instead scientists and engineers used it to produce his wonderful film on the moon. era of the race to space.

One last scene: light grievances and finish the film and write on screen the names of the heroes of this historical work.