Does Aoun contest Article 80 of the general budget?

Sources close to him confirmed that the law would not be sent back to the House of Representatives because it is not in the interests of budgeting a budget as long as it has demanded its approval as a record of its time . He is also responsible, aware of the anticipated positive repercussions on the financial situation and the evaluation of the situation abroad. However, all this does not mask the imbalance that the President of the Republic sees in the inclusion of a paragraph in Article 80, which has nothing to do with the House of Representatives nor with the budget for lack of financial status.

He also learned that the President of the Republic would not contest the article before the Constitutional Council and that the "strong Lebanese bloc" who supported him would not appeal, on the grounds that the Constitutional Council would not consider this article. alone, but the budget as a whole, it is unacceptable for the President of the Republic.

However, the planned step of the block is to introduce an accelerated bill to repeal the article in the House of Representatives, while it was previously known that the fate of the proposal depends on the holding of A public meeting of President Nabih Berri and the temptation to abandon the proposal to vote or, at best, to abandon the dispatch status. He goes to committees and can go to the 2020 budget.

Sources close to Baabda said that the President of the Republic and the "strong Lebanese Bloc" did not recognize the status quo. If Aoun is bound by a specific deadline of one month to return or to promulgate the laws and decrees adopted by the Council of Ministers, the decrees called decrees of the Public Service Council are ordinary decrees, And the publication of the Article in the finance law is not to publish these decrees, but will continue to prevent the administrative imbalance related to the addition of the last paragraph to the article, as a contradiction of the requirements of coexistence and constituting an interference in the powers of the executive power.