Einstein was right in his theory of relativity, but scientists have discovered it recently! | Technology



[ad_1]

Scientists have confirmed that Albert Einstein's theory of restricted relativity is true, this time thanks to the particle detector buried deep in Antarctica.

Scientists studied the 1-gigaton neutron observatory called IceCube Neutrino Observatory. Neutrinos called: Evasive primary particles that move very fast, with a mbad much smaller than the mbad of the electron, and do not carry an electric charge. The researchers wondered whether these small high-energy molecules would deviate from the behavior predicted by the theory of special relativity. Specifically, when they tested a principle known as Lorentz symmetry or Lorentz persistence, the principle that the laws of physics are constant, whether you are an astronaut traveling a million miles to the hour or a spiral slowly moving to the surface of the Earth,

The Effects of Relativity in Real Life

Neutrinos are everywhere, but they move alone through the universe, interacting rarely with other particles. When neutrinos move in the space of the universe, they oscillate between three different states, called physicists, which are: neutrino electrons, neutrinos and neutrinos. When neutrinos interact with ice under the observatory, they transform into mesons, which in turn carry a negative electric charge and can be detected using the detector

If the principle of Lorentz symmetry can be applied in this case, the neutrino with a certain mbad should fluctuate at a predictable rate. This means that the neutrino has to travel a certain distance before becoming a millon. Therefore, any deviation from this rate can be evidence that the universe in which we live does not work as predicted by Einstein

This means that neutrinos represent "sensitive sensors to capture spatial effects" . The director of the study, Carlos Arguelles, physicist specializing in particle physics at the Mbadachusetts Institute of Technology

Arguelles said in an interview with Live Science magazine, "Theories may collapse, or they may have new effects when you look in new areas. "

A violation of Lorentz Symmetry

I've Researched Scientists have found evidence of Lorentz violation in many cases, photons to gravity, but they are still unable to find evidence. However, in the case of neutrinos, scientists can "explore this new high-energy system, which has not been explored before," Arguelis said.

Arguelles and his colleagues badyzed the neutrino data collected by the Observatory over two years. Their research did not reveal a Lorentz type break in high energy neutrinos. "This puts an end to the debate over the possibility of a violation of Lorentz's constancy, carried out by a group of high-energy neutrinos for a very long time," said Janet Conrad, a physics researcher at the Mbadachusetts Institute of Technology. This result allowed the researchers to show by a calculation that everything that interacts with neutrinos at a level of energy greater than the base force 10 is high at a negative 36 Giga-electron-volt (GeV) square. , it seems to follow the natural rules of Neutrinos oscillations, in the sense that the Lorentz symmetry is still alive Ml as expected. To put it in a scientific context, it can be said that tiny neutrinos interact with matter at an energy level of about 10, up to minus 5 Gigaelectrons per square, which is still an incredibly low level, but 10 microns "

Conrad said," We have been able to determine the extent to which neutrinos have been affected by the Lorentz breach. "

Arguelles commented that neutrinos had not yet been discovered when Einstein died, but his theory she still predicts his behavior, which is unbelievable" up to now, we do not have to. found no evidence of the atmosphere D. A problem in Einstein's theory of space relativity. "

However, Arguelles and his colleagues plan to continue to explore high-energy phenomena in cases where there may be a break in Lorentz's symmetry." When exploring new situations, you may find that things that were not important before have become important now. "

* The results were published yesterday (July 16) in Nature Physics.

[ad_2]
Source link