[ad_1]
Lea Al-Qazi wrote in Al-Akhbar:
The day when the discussion was ahead of the vote in the Council of Ministers to refer the crime of orchards before the Council of Justice, a race between the Progressive Socialist Party and the Lebanese Democrat, religious authorities and some political forces. They wanted to gather the largest number of "votes" of his group. The list of visits did not include all Lebanese components, but the headquarters of the Marada faction, former MP Suleiman Franjieh, was a common option between the "socialist" and the "progressive". Al-Jumblatt's party, despite contradictory political positions with Franjieh, has established good relations with the Marada movement, which has strengthened during the presidential elections. They were joined by the rival of the leader of the Free Patriotism Movement, Minister Gebran Bbadil, who considered the "socialist" as the main cause of the orchards. Therefore, the "bet" of Al-Jumblati was that Franjieh would vote against the return of "orchards" to the Council of Justice. On the "democratic" agenda, the visit to Benshei is "fundamental", for the reasons mentioned above, but from a different angle. The political alliance between the Awn movement and the Democratic Party left traces on the relations between the latter and Al-Marda. Even though the orchard crime division was held on March 8 and 14, the "democrat" was not sure of the position that the minister of the faction al-Marda, Yusuf Fenianus, would occupy in the government. . It was possible that Fanyanus, in the absence of Minister of the voting session of the Judicial Council, would become the "Minister of the King". Hence the "justification" of the two visits, which resulted in a conclusion: the trend of rebellion will vote with the option of Hezbollah. However, according to sources in Neshii, the situation would have been reported to the delegation of the "Socialist", without opening the "biography" of the Justice Council with the "Democrat", adding that they "are certain that the subject will not be put to the vote of the Council of Ministers ".
The common denominator between visits was Franjieh's repentance. During the meeting with the delegation of the Democratic Party, the leader of the rebellion movement spoke about the relationship of the latter with the free patriotic movement. He said to them, "What do you mean?" The subject of the conversation, Franjieh was reminded that Arslan "is my longtime friend and that my relationship with him is good". Sources deny that Franjieh "reprimanded" the delegation of the Democratic Party, "that they have come back and finally remember, after their alliance with the Aoun movement," explaining that former MP Zgharta had emphasized how the alliance and the way to strengthen their relationships. In form, there are things that do not control, not the interest of Arslan. "However," the mood of the visit was positive ".
Franjieh recorded notes in the form of the relationship between Arslan and Basil
In the same conclusion, sources in Neshii are keen to describe the meeting between Al-Marada and the delegation of the Socialist Party. There was clarity about the existence of a "political difference between the two parties, but the relationship is good and do not forget to stand in the presidential election." The Socialists have presented their narrative of the orchard crime "which they describe as an incident, but they consider what is happening at home as a plot originating in Syria." Franjieh replied that Jumblatt was carrying more Syria than she "This country is full of problems and concerns that go beyond the details of Lebanon." The first advice was that "Shilo is the subject of your head." The second point, raised by Frangieh, is the Socialist attack on Hezbollah If former MP Walid Jumblatt attacked the Syrian state in the previous period in return for Hezbollah's neutralization of his constituency, there would be no reason To go too far in the hostility with the party Franjieh has focused more than once during the session on the need for the Socialist Party to reform its relations with Hezbollah, "without the objection of this delegati "In the same context, political sources consider that one of the tension factors of Walid Jumblatt, and his escalation in the case of" orchards ", is the break with Hezbollah. and his desire to reopen the communication channels and obtain "guarantees" from Haret Hreik.
[ad_2]
Source link
