Hariri is waiting for a difficult task … American pressure is great

Under the title "Additional Chapters of American Pressure … and Contradictions in Local Approaches", Hiyam Eid wrote in Al-Diar newspaper that Prime Minister Saad Hariri's visit to the United States coincided with the escalation of the tension between Washington and Tehran. The United States published by Washington or the State Department in particular, wore more than one character and message to all local parties without referring to the regional clash while drawing the attention. attention to the Gulf region. In this respect, political circles did not expect the easing of the internal crisis to tighten on the expected trends in the Lebanese reality in the United States, particularly with regard to the US action against Hezbollah and the pressure expected for the next step, while Lebanon is facing an economic and financial crisis. As a result of US decisions and sanctions against banks in the case of relations with the party

These circles revealed that Hariri's mission will not be easy because he will have to face all the meetings he will hold, knowing that turning the page of the political crisis resulting from the Qabrishmoun incident is a positive element of the stance. Lebanese official in Washington, where the consensus and the internal solidarity confer this position, More dynamism and force vis-a-vis the American pressures linked to the regional conflict mainly and which come from the shipyards of the region, including Lebanon as a center or arena of this conflict.
On the other hand, the political circles themselves stressed that the Prime Minister used, at all his meetings in Washington, to neutralize the Lebanese commitment at the regional level and to defend the reality of the political, financial and economic stability and thus put the accent on the concern of Lebanon and the government not to take a stand. With any regional or international third party, especially the United States of America. Therefore, the next step will involve reappointing all these headlines, but with a difference of local approaches began to emerge through conflicting readings of the content of the US Embbady statement, where the positions were divided between the refusal to interfere directly in Lebanon's internal affairs by deepening the internal division, and between This statement should not affect the national debate and reaffirm the need to neutralize Lebanon from all conflicts in the region and external interventions, whatever their origin.
To read the full article, click here.