[ad_1]
07:00 p
Thursday 31 January 2019
Books – Assem Al-Ansari:
The recent increase in the number of data breaches and the growing mistrust of the processing of personal data by business customers are one of the main reasons for the growing awareness of the importance of data protection for users and businesses.
Users are taking more and more steps to protect their private data, which increases the number of searches for privacy applications such as Virtual Private Network (VPN) applications.
Many users are searching for VPN apps in my Google Play and Store Store apps. VPN is the second largest unbranded search criterion, and hundreds of millions of downloads have been downloaded recently.
According to the Arab Technical News portal, Top10VPN has conducted security investigations that have revealed that official application stores are failing to secure their users by hosting applications with vulnerabilities, unclear privacy policies and developers illegal immigrants with unreliable connections.
It also shows five points that show that these stores offer false security in the protection of your data:
1. Lack of interest in the protection of privacy
Of the 20 free VPNs of Google Play and Store Store, 86% had privacy rules making it difficult to protect the personal data of users.
A study by Top10VPN found that 85% of the 150 most popular "VPN" free apps on the Google Play Store offer permissions or source code that could result in users being violated. We are talking about games or other entertainment applications, but in the case of virtual private networks – where users transmit all their movements over the Internet through the servers managed by the application developer – these results are catastrophic for the protection of the Internet. private life.
2. Share data with a third party
VPNs typically have standard privacy policies explaining how to protect Internet traffic data from records or controls, but some applications reviewed explicitly stated that they migrated this data to China, where many companies own these applications. Even worse, not being able to guess what many developers of virtual private network applications – which provide strategies without details – can do with browsing data pbading through their servers.
3. Non-application of stricter standards
In China, six out of ten companies are Chinese companies, reputed to monitor and censor the Internet, which has recently taken action to crack down on local VPNs that may violate the privacy of the user. That's why Apple and Google have not put in place a more rigorous set of standards on these apps to protect their users.
4. Quality badurance in the application stores is not required
After the Cambridge scandal revealed how Facebook handled its personal data, Apple launched the "ONAVO Protect" application, owned by Facebook Inc., an badytics and protection company specializing in Internet browsing. via a virtual VPN. Store Store "for its incompatibility with its privacy rules.
As for Google, it clearly does not work, except in case of obligation, since Google has removed 85 apps from its store, after discovering that it was a problem. advertising program displaying full screen ads on Android devices. "These applications were video game applications, video applications and simulated remote control applications, which affected nearly 9 million Android users worldwide.
It is clear that the quality badurance in the app stores is not so powerful, as thousands of potential malicious applications are left free to attract millions of dollars. # 39; s users. Measures are then taken.
5. Do not clarify who are the owners of the applications
The most troubling part of the Top10VPN study on these applications is the extent to which the team investigated the companies responsible for developing these applications, which the average user will not be able to do. "Apple" and "Google" to clarify, we find here appropriate to ask a lot of questions about these companies and what they do with the user data and why not explicitly disclosed to users.
Source link
