[ad_1]
The Supervisory Authority elections pointed out that the request made by the Minister of Information Melhem Al-Riyashi to Justice Minister Salim Griissati And the President of the Judicial Council The Supreme Court Justice, Jean Fahd, and the defendant of The year of discrimination, Judge Samir Hammoud, represents an attempt to prevent the judiciary from considering referrals directed against the media under its custody, in violation of the principle of separation of powers. It has already indicated its commitment to liberties in Lebanon, including freedom of the media and respect for the right of expression, while underlining its commitment to apply the provisions of the law that specify its powers in relation to the media that contravene the provisions of the law . The Lebanese media, Melhem al-Riyashi, mentioned in his application Several days to stop the prosecution and the preservation of the referrals against the media in question, these actions have a "negative material and moral impact on the media institutions and the climate of freedoms in particular ", according to the book of the National Council of Information and Audiovisual Media.
He went on to argue in the context of Al-Riyashi that the Electoral Supervisory Authority did not specify the criteria for distinguishing between the election media and the electoral statement, as required by law on the election of members of the Legislative Council. The Election Supervisory Authority, the body responsible for overseeing electoral rights in Lebanon, recently transferred 41 news organizations (video, audio, paper and electronic) to the Publications Court, which was received . The Lebanese media and television channels issued a joint statement in which they consider the Commission's decision to be a violation of its statutory powers and that the body "has become a regulator of the media and media. Freedom of the Media in Lebanon: Day Seven [19659010] Related Topics
[ad_2]
Source link