[ad_1]
MEP Wahba Qatisha, MP for the "strong republic", stressed that Labor Minister Kamil Abu Suleiman would not back down from law enforcement, which preserves the right of Lebanon, which is struck by a wall. Especially that the Lebanese law gives them their rights and increases.
Qatisha said in an interview with Al-Naharah that the Palestinian movement in the street is more political than human rights. Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas pursued with the minister and understood many things, but we are Some that the axis of resistance is behind these movements The Palestinian factions are getting closer to him because he does not want Lebanon's stability because it does not mean neither Lebanese nor Palestinian work.
Qatisha pointed out that Prime Minister Saad Hariri was not at all against the application of the law by the minister, but there are 10 points related to the Palestinians in the plan applied by the minister. 7 of them fall within the scope of his powers and wait for the Cabinet to decide the remaining 3 points.
Acting on the government crisis caused by the Qabrchmoun incident, regret for the country's transformation is a stampede launched by the forces and political components that continue to disengage, emphasizing that the position of forces is clear in this case and calls for an investigation into the scope of application to determine the outcome of appropriate investigations And whether it is a judicial council or any other court. "Our position is not related to that of Walid Jumblatt (the leader of the Progressive Socialist Party), but is a natural and logical position in the circumstances and the current data, no problem can be submitted to the Council of Justice without specifying the reasons.
In response to a question about the relationship with the "Free Patriotic" after the budget debate, Qatisha pointed out that the chairman of the Finance and Budget Committee, who is also the secretary of the "strong Lebanon" bloc, has was the first to criticize the budget in his report. Parliament, considering that there is nothing legal in this one except the first chapter and that it is absent from the economic vision, added: "We do not forget not the cruel criticism addressed to it by MPs Michel Moawad and Shamil Roquez, but we agree with our position from the beginning, so we talked about negative points And we tried to create a kind of positive shock allowing the government and the people to engage seriously in the path of reform. "" The budget that was approved and voted against is a compromise between the despair of the lack of economic vision and the fact that 39 It touches the pockets of the poor, we have announced its rejection since the beginning of the discussions, and our vote was consistent with what we had called from the beginning.
[ad_2]
Source link
