The presidential compromise shakes its base. "Future" and "Free Patriotic" on the verge of divorce

It seems that the "Kibrishmoun" incident has begun to create an unclear disagreement between the poles of the presidential settlement, particularly in light of the support of the "Future" movement of the leader of the "Progressive Socialist Party" Walid Jumblatt, who is offset by an escalation of the "free national" "Spearheads" in the conflict around the Justice Council's record and the consequent disruption of government.

While all efforts to reach an appropriate outcome of this increasingly complex issue have failed, Aoun and Hariri have become clumsy in front of some ministers and public opinion who blame the parties for the paralysis that has struck the country. . Sources from the "House of the Center" believe that the obstacles facing the government are the responsibility of the President of the Republic ignoring the attempts of his team to undermine the powers of its president.

Moreover, sources of the "Free Patriotic Movement" indicate that the ball in the case of the Judicial Council is set in the court of President Saad Hariri, who uses his constitutional powers to confront the President's team by holding on the defense line with his opponents!

Sources close to the presidential palace said some media leaks directed against President Michel Aoun came from the "center house", which provoked strong tension between the two sides, adding that the prime minister insisted on remaining faithful to his plans. credentials, claiming that the issue had overcome the political conflict and reached the limit of the coup d'etat. The Taif Accord, which the Prime Minister exaggerates in describing it as a violation of the constitution and a sectarian imbalance in Lebanon.

There is no doubt that the return of the political alignments of the March 14th and 8th groups will increase the tension between the "future" and the "free national", as both sides take up the fight. initiative to put the political claims of their allies on the table of the Council of Ministers, which could lead to the explosion of media relations between them, followed by a decline in the level of the political and new alliance, and perhaps the official media monitoring of both streams, are the most obvious evidence of a violation of the rule of colonization and imbalance, which has taken a rising trajectory since the formation of the government until today.

Despite the accession of the parties to the presidential agreement and the impossibility for any one of the sources to achieve a confrontation that would lead to a political divorce between the two parties, the pursuit the paralleling of the "Qabrshmon" incident at the meetings of the Council of Ministers could widen the dispute between them and lead to a deep gap between the two parties. The relationship between the two sides of the settlement, knowing that one party does not intend to give the other, but the amount of pressure surrounding the political and economic climate at the local level can contribute to the conclusion of an agreement allowing to overcome the crisis and solve it.