What did the "future" explain about the debate between the presidency and the government?

The future of the Movement for the future, a spokesman of the Movement for the future, a position on the subject of the debate between the Presidency of the Republic and the government as it is appeared today in the media and the press, denying the existence of a deep disagreement between them, and criticizing some of those close to the presidency of the Republic as a result of the leakage of this atmosphere . The website stated that:

War of the powers "or the nearest fatwas pouring oil on .. Arguments?

It is exaggerated to speak of a power struggle between the presidency and the Council of Ministers, provoked by reactions that do not correspond to the position of the presidency and their place in the management of public affairs, expressing yesterday the Minister Elias Abu Saab with regard to the government's comments, Leaks the corridors of the palace that Lebanon is a country and not a clan, commenting the clarification of the same source on the position of Prime Minister Saad Hariri.

A familiar source on this subject, stating that this could sometimes recall the memory of treason, that since his return to power, Prime Minister Hariri has adopted an approach based on the consideration of cooperation and coordination between the presidency and the Presidency of the Council of Ministers is no longer a valid manipulation and is subject to auction, The political stability of state work and constitutional institutions, aware of the inconvenience of many previous years' experiences, put the country more than once in political divergences broke.

And the fact that some media have moved away from the corridors of the palace to talk about the constitutional right of the president of the country to convene a meeting of the Council of Ministers in agreement with the Prime Minister, and facts of a telephone conversation between the two presidents, is the is certainly surprising and adds to the political reality that more confusion and attraction.

The call between the two presidents and what happens there is the exclusive right of Presidents Michel Aoun and Saad Hariri: no minister or adviser of close badociates has the right to do so. act as a medium through which oil is poured into the fire. Attitudes and Arguments. In addition, no one can challenge the powers of the President of the Republic in accordance with Article 53 of the Constitution and Article 12 in particular, because it also involves a subject which is not on the agenda and there is no reason to comment on it as if the Prime Minister was failing his powers. In addition, the call between the two presidents did not address this issue from near or far, and addressed the need to convene the Council of Ministers and create a climate conducive to a session.

"We are in this area to meet the source who told the Baabda Palace that Lebanon is a state and not a clan, and because this is supposed to be the recourse to institutions a permanent policy and not on the play, we have remedy when it is in our favor and disable it if that is not compatible with that interest.

The Prime Minister waited more than three weeks to lift the political stone of the convening of the Council of Ministers: he took the responsibility to suspend the invitation with the approval of all to avoid that the The government faces an unknown internal conflict until the fall of the initiative. What is rejected by Prime Minister Hariri and will not be handed over to anyone other than the President of the Republic to avoid the occurrence of the Council of Ministers In the trap of uncomputed results, or in other traps are directed to guide judicial inquiries in certain tracks on the extent of a member.

Instead of wasting time giving controversial advice, it is advisable to redouble efforts to calm the situation, defuse the conflict and activate the axes of reconciliation.

50% discount on Premium annual subscription