Why did the shepherd accuse the information of torture and fabrication? (New)

The Maronite Patriarch, Cardinal Mar Bechara al-Ra'i, yesterday attacked the ISF's information service, accusing his officers of "fabricating records of people of one faith" and of talk about torture in "the cellars of the security forces and the information division during the investigation," reported Al-Akhbar. ".

The attack of the patriarch was also accompanied by the summoning of the lieutenant. On the day of the shepherd's position, al-Hajj spent eight hours investigating the information.

Sources of management have badociated Bkirki's attack to the branch to question Hobeish, "according to which she and her husband, lawyer Ziad Hobeish, have strong connections to the patriarchal edifice." Some sources have also linked the canonical attack against the security apparatus and the findings of the investigation of the section on Qabrshmoun-Basateen incident, in which "information" refuted two badumptions of the FPM: an ambush to badbadinate Minister Saleh al-Gharib or a plot to badbadinate Minister Basil.

However, Bkirki sources denied having "news" which circulates on the link between the invocation of the pilgrim and the patriarch's position, pointing out that the patriarch was not aware of the invocation of the pilgrim.

The same sources felt that the patriarch's position was based on what was going on in the media about the torture.

When asked if the patriarch had responded to Osman's request to send someone to interrogate the detainees to verify that the rumors were false, Bkerki's sources replied that this was not part of his mission, citing "confusion in positions that is only explained by direct contact between Othman and the Patriarch".