[ad_1]
"I can clearly say why Nerijus Antanavičius is offered a full term of detention, without delay, and he is always in a position to violate the requirements of the law, to disregard the obligations imposed upon him. not think that in case of deprivation of parole in this case, the purpose of the sentence would be achieved ", – Saulius Galminas, Prosecutor of the 2nd Floor of the Klaipėda Regional Prosecutor's Office, 15min explains why, despite a certain repentance of N. Antanavičius,
On Wednesday, the last speeches of the participants in the fraud case were heard in the Klaipėda District Court and the judge began drafting a verdict [19659003] According to the record, the group wanted Swedbank and DnB Bank to seize more than 200 thousand euros. The four accused, Simonas Paulauskas, Darius Petrutis, Arturas Jonas Venslauskas and N. Antanavičius, took part in the roles of the company, acquired the shares of the operating company, took over the accounting documents and the electronic card reader, knowing that they would not be doing any real activity related to the company. The men, using an electronic card reader, have sought to capture nearly 200,000 euros belonging to DnB.
AJVenslauskas and N. Antanavičius were recognized as the organizers of this crime, while the other two accused were only executors.
J. Andriejauskaite / 15min nuotr. / Nerijus Antanavičius arrived at the Klaipėda District Court, where he began to investigate a case of fraud
Attorney S. Kalminas claimed that all the defendants had essentially acknowledged their criminal acts. The only nuance: The man of Mios does not want to be considered as one of the organizers of this area, but also as the only executor
The culprit, not denying it, N.Antanavičius does not want not be considered one of the organizers of this sphere. on the contrary. The only fact that it was in the pocket of N. Antanavičius that the remaining 8,000 euros, that the group had the chance to seize. With the executors S. Paulauskas and D. Petručius, the man shared several hundred euros and gave nothing to AJVenslauskas in general
The prosecutor 15min also pointed out that N. Antanavicius had committed new violations of the law within one year when the Vilnius District Court relieved him of his criminal responsibility. Then N. Antanavičius was convicted of a conflict, while he was defending his wife in a public place, he became involved in a conflict. The man avoided punishment after reconciliation with the victim, but he did not meet the other mandatory conditions – do not repeat the crime in the near future.
A.Jašinskienė At the same time, it seems unacceptable to Prosecutor S. Galmin that the accused abused and systematically violates legal standards in recent years. For example, he drove the drunkard, then he was sometimes locked behind the wheel without a driver's license.
N. Antanavičius had not yet paid a fine for having hunted in the fall of 2015.
Neither one nor the other N. Antanavičius did not does not pay the fines imposed on him for 11 to several hundred euros for road driving offenses, for reoffending on the road and for minor penalties. The prosecutor 's office still does not have information that N. Antanavičius allegedly paid the fine that had been charged to him for unsafe driving until autumn 2015.
All this feature of N. Antanavičius The Klaipėda Regional Prosecutor's Office requires that a man be sentenced to 3 years and 6 months
Understand Instantly
- A four man who has created a criminal mechanism to persuade the bank to do so. using fictitious agreements with fake customers and illegally acquired payment card data to foreign citizens was trying to escape during the week. The group cashed more than 8,000 euros into the company's account, but the bank's employees were uncertain about the legality of the transactions, the company's accounts were blocked and the shutdown plan nearly 190,000 euros was stopped.
- The same plan, with only another bank, tried to implement the quad again in April 2017. After defrauding the bank, the group received nearly 5,000 euros in the account of the company. business, while seeking to win nearly 38 000 euros in total
at that time, his prosecutor AJ Wenslausk sentenced him to 5 years imprisonment. According to the state badessment, the fraud and the prosecution of S. Pauluskas and D.Petrutis must also be considered guilty and sentenced to two years imprisonment, but they could be delayed for the sentencing.
[ad_2]
Source link
