[ad_1]
Permanent explanations from politicians, government officials and other stakeholders indicate that three cogeneration plants in Lithuania are becoming increasingly tense in society.
Does waste incineration – the implementation of circular economy policy?
Although it was decided to build power plants in Vilnius and Kaunas, the construction of power plants in Vilnius and Kaunas, but deliberations in the media and between institutions and politicians do not stop not here. Nerijus Rasburskis, director of the UAB cogeneration project "Lietuvos energija", was quoted in his report, published several times at the Seimas Committee on the Environment, and before the end of the spring session, information on the amount of waste generated and the need for power plants. sentences as a necessity to complete the construction of the Kaunas and Vilnius power plants while fulfilling their obligations to the European Union and implementing the circular economy policy. Although the task of the circular economy is a renewable system in which the costs of resources and waste are reduced by managing and properly integrating it into a closed energy and material chain, the rapporteur proposed that 39 Incineration as the main measure of waste incineration. Since up to 50% of all waste is currently landfilled, waste incineration is one of the most likely and most likely to solve the problem. Such quantities would fully power the power plants and, if not, they could operate at 50% power.
And advise and implement
R. The Rasbursky report from many members of the Environment Committee was greeted with stormy comments. Not only did they interpret the potentially misleading policy of the government to focus solely on the incineration of waste, but they also linked the reporter himself to AF-Consult, which he had previously created, directed, and managed for the construction of a power plant of 10 million euros. 19659002] These questions did not belong to politicians at all. Until recently, an agreement on the gas terminal, a large-capacity hazardous waste incinerator "Toksika", a former medical waste company "Senovia", an MBA, a Leo LT project and many others case of waste of public funds
Arturas Skardžius, member of the Sejm, observes whether a private company such as Fortla de Klaipeda, owned by major Russian corporations, can develop its activities by building a second power plant in Kaunas. In his view, the overcapacity of the two power plants, the potential liability of the state to the banks is another measure that increases the taxation of the company. Several times, the Seimas member doubts that Lietuvos Energija UAB has implemented this project as a public or private enterprise.
It is still possible to return to sorting and processing
Paulius Saudargas and Virginija Vingrien. According to them, UAB Lietuvos energija does not align entirely on state policy in the directives of the European Union, the circular economy strategy that provides that the waste management must above all, sorting, recycling and recycling. It is now time not to repeat the process of the long European Union countries when they introduced waste incinerators and then turn to the recycling and waste recycling industry.
While reminding the rapporteur that in Denmark and in other countries society is actively engaged in the decision to burn or not to waste, Linas Balsys, member of the Seimas, reacts in reaction to the title from the report: "Our whole project is Kogen." According to him, it's a mockery of our society. One is the decision of the population to burn incineration in Denmark or elsewhere, and the municipality may be happy for this, but the residents of Lithuania are also not in favor of this waste incineration. He believes that in Lithuania, in the face of aggressive commercial breakthroughs, efforts will be made to bring waste from elsewhere, thus ensuring equipment capacity. Kogen is a project for all
In this long process, one of the most active communities in the city of Lazdynai to this day is due to the construction of waste. combustion plant in Jočionių g. 13, Vilnius, until now does not give peace to politicians and institutions of the state.
He recalls that the inhabitants of Lazdynas have collected 1200 signatures for the stop of the construction of the power station and recalls that in Denmark or elsewhere, Algis Strelciunas, member of the Seimas, has listened to the requests of voters regarding the stop of the construction of the incineration plant. In other countries, primary sorting is much better developed. In our containers, even waste such as batteries, drugs are included. And it is already a hazardous waste and one must ensure, a higher incineration temperature than those at 850 ° C, which is now expected. He also criticized the work done by N. Rasburskis as a well-functioning factory located at the same location in the MBO. There are about 20 females on the conveyor belt and it is left on the side of the conveyor. But, as promised, the entire sorting process will be automated and designed in accordance with the most advanced technology infrastructure. The Lazdijai people has long struggled for the ex-scandalous UAB Senovė, who had to burn hazardous medical waste at 1300 ° C and burn at -700 ° C only.
When badessing the environmental impact, residents submitted a lot of suggestions and comments. no response has been given. Even at the request of raising the chimney so that pollution is not close to residential areas, it has been said that a tall chimney would damage the city's landscape. The issue of traffic flow is still not resolved and finally, after a long debate, it is only now that the pollution measuring station is being transferred to the emergency hospital. from Vilnius, said A. Strelciunas
. Inhabitants of Serbian settlements. They were particularly disappointed by the scandalous performance of Kaunas MBA, when a few years ago, the inhabitants of the immediate neighborhoods of the economy were suffering from herbaria. Therefore, the information disseminated by the UAB "Lietuvos energija" does not believe that at the same time all the necessary infrastructure will be provided and the surrounding population will not be hindered by incineration. Although authorities are still not heard and properly evaluated, they must not stop stopping at a cleaner environment.
The environmental impact badessment report of the Kaunas cogeneration plant shows that the process generates and releases a number of harmful substances in the environment such as the sulfur dioxide, nitric oxide, particulates, carbon monoxide, hydrogen chloride, hydrogen fluoride, carbon monoxide, cadmium, thallium and their compounds, antimony, arsenic, lead, chromium, cobalt, copper, manganese, nickel, vanadium and their compounds, ammonia. During the operation of the plant, after having burned some 250 tons of waste through stationary sources of ambient air pollution, about 600 tons of pollutants per year will be emitted into the environment. ;environment. Emissions from the waste incineration plant themselves, in addition to background pollution, will not exceed the limit value. However, pollution by waste incinerators every year, every day, every hour falls on the population, on gardens and fields will enter the food chain
Again, we have built millions of expensive sorters. Although food waste, green and other in the primary chain, before sorting, are mixed, crushed, polluted and completely inactive to be recycled. Therefore, "sorted" waste is only suitable for combustion and we pay higher taxes. Anyone with little education in waste management raises the question of who to build sorting plants if primary sorting units do not work and are unclear, but rather packaged, waste is always burned or disposed of in landfills. However, residents pay for everything.
Thus, priorities in waste management and the circular economy will wait for us. Above all, do not miss a train that has already burned a green light for waste incineration and the realization of related interests. Environment Minister Kęstutis Navickas said that according to the calculations of the Ministry of the Environment, the amount of waste incinerated after 2030 could be insufficient and that he would personally seek to prevent it. incineration of waste even earlier.
will definitely win this marathon of interest groups, but it is clear that the public becomes the sole guarantor of a more transparent waste management policy. Of course, if she does not sleep. The government, too, would be guided by a policy that is not limited in time but a country favorable to continuation
[ad_2]
Source link
